Supreme Court proposes draft rules limiting AI in judicial processes

The Supreme Court AI Committee has released draft regulations that bar the use of artificial intelligence for determining judicial outcomes or profiling witnesses and parties in court cases.

The preliminary draft titled Regulations for Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Courts, 2026 was made public on June 3. It requires that AI systems operate only in an assistive role strictly under human judicial authority and prohibits opaque or unexplainable AI in any court process. The rules allow AI for administrative tasks such as case management and transcription but ban its use for risk scoring, bail eligibility assessments, or predicting recidivism. They also require compliance with the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 and mandate safeguards against bias based on race, religion, caste, or other prohibited grounds. A committee chaired by Justice P.S. Narasimha has invited public comments until June 20. The draft further proposes an apex body at the Supreme Court to oversee AI adoption in the judiciary.

Awọn iroyin ti o ni ibatan

White House scene illustrating Trump administration's National AI Legislative Framework unifying rules against China's dominance.
Àwòrán tí AI ṣe

Trump administration moves to unify AI rules against China

Ti AI ṣe iroyin Àwòrán tí AI ṣe

The Trump administration has released a National AI Legislative Framework to unify federal AI rules, address national security concerns, and counter Beijing's growing dominance in the sector. It argues that state laws should not govern areas better suited to the federal government or contradict US strategy for global AI leadership. The White House looks forward to working with Congress to turn it into legislation.

The Japanese government announced on Friday it will establish a council of experts to discuss whether unauthorized use of sound data in AI-generated content emulating voice actors violates the Civil Code, amid advances in generative AI. The Justice Ministry panel will also address use of actors' images and present guidelines by July, as no legal precedent exists.

Ti AI ṣe iroyin

India's Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology proposed persistent labels for AI-generated content on social media in a notice issued on April 21. The move amends IT Rules to enhance oversight on user-generated news. Feedback is invited until May 7.

The Senate Judiciary Committee unanimously approved a bipartisan bill requiring AI companies to implement age verification for chatbots to protect minors. The legislation, co-sponsored by Senators Josh Hawley and Richard Blumenthal, prohibits AI companions for children and blocks sexually explicit content or self-harm encouragement. This rare cross-aisle agreement signals potential for swift Senate passage.

Ti AI ṣe iroyin

The Information Commissioner’s Office has issued guidance stating that content generated by artificial intelligence in UK public bodies falls under freedom of information laws. This includes prompts used by staff along with the outputs produced.

Ojú-ìwé yìí nlo kuki

A nlo kuki fun itupalẹ lati mu ilọsiwaju wa. Ka ìlànà àṣírí wa fun alaye siwaju sii.
Kọ