Illustration of a judge upholding $243M verdict against Tesla in Autopilot fatal crash trial, blending courtroom drama with crash wreckage.
Illustration of a judge upholding $243M verdict against Tesla in Autopilot fatal crash trial, blending courtroom drama with crash wreckage.
Image generated by AI

Judge upholds $243 million verdict against Tesla in fatal Autopilot crash

Image generated by AI

A US federal judge has rejected Tesla's request to overturn a $243 million jury verdict related to a 2019 fatal crash involving the company's Autopilot feature. The ruling holds Tesla partially responsible for the incident that killed one person and injured another. Tesla is expected to appeal the decision.

On Friday, US District Judge Beth Bloom in Miami upheld a jury verdict from August 2025 that found Tesla 33% responsible for a deadly crash involving its Autopilot system. The incident occurred on April 25, 2019, in Key Largo, Florida, when George McGee was driving a 2019 Model S at about 62 mph. While using Autopilot, McGee bent down to retrieve a dropped phone and crashed into an SUV parked on the shoulder, where Naibel Benavides Leon, 22, and her boyfriend Dillon Angulo were standing. Benavides was killed, and Angulo was severely injured.

The jury awarded $19.5 million in compensatory damages to Benavides' estate and $23.1 million to Angulo, along with $200 million in punitive damages to be split between them. Judge Bloom stated that the evidence at trial "more than supports" the verdict and that Tesla presented no new arguments to challenge it. This marks the first federal jury verdict concerning a fatal accident involving Autopilot.

Tesla had sought to reverse the decision, arguing that McGee bore sole blame, the Model S and Autopilot were not defective, and the punitive damages were unwarranted under Florida law, as the company did not show "reckless disregard for human life." Adam Boumel, a lawyer for the victims' families, welcomed the ruling. "From day one, Tesla has refused to accept responsibility," Boumel said in an email. "Autopilot was defective, and Tesla put it on American roads before it was ready and before it was safe."

Tesla has not commented publicly but is anticipated to appeal. The company faces ongoing investigations from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration into Autopilot and Full Self-Driving features, amid multiple lawsuits over its self-driving technology.

What people are saying

Discussions on X about the upheld $243 million verdict against Tesla in the 2019 Autopilot crash show divided opinions. Critics argue the amount is excessive and could raise costs for consumers, while supporters emphasize accountability for misleading marketing of the feature. Some predict more lawsuits ahead, and Tesla defenders note instances where the technology has saved lives.

Related Articles

Courtroom scene illustrating Tesla's lawsuit against California DMV over Autopilot and Full Self-Driving false advertising claims.
Image generated by AI

Tesla sues California DMV to overturn false advertising ruling on Autopilot and Full Self-Driving

Reported by AI Image generated by AI

Tesla filed a lawsuit on February 13, 2026, against the California Department of Motor Vehicles, challenging a December 2025 ruling that accused the company of misleading consumers through marketing of its Autopilot and Full Self-Driving features. Despite complying with required changes to avoid a sales license suspension, Tesla argues the decision was factually erroneous, legally flawed, and lacked evidence of consumer harm. The dispute underscores intense scrutiny of Tesla's driver-assistance systems amid its major California operations.

A federal judge in Miami has denied Tesla's request to overturn a $243 million jury verdict related to a fatal 2019 Autopilot crash in Florida. The ruling means Tesla must now face the judgment at the trial court level, though the company plans to appeal. The case involves a collision that killed one person and injured another.

Reported by AI

A federal judge in Miami has rejected Tesla's attempt to overturn a $243 million jury verdict related to a 2019 fatal crash involving the company's Autopilot system. The ruling upholds the decision from a trial that found the evidence strongly supported the verdict. This decision exhausts Tesla's options at the trial court level amid ongoing lawsuits over its driver-assistance technology.

The U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has opened an investigation into Tesla's Full Self-Driving system after receiving dozens of complaints about traffic violations. The probe covers 2.88 million vehicles and follows reports of 14 crashes and 23 injuries linked to the feature. This marks the third such inquiry into Tesla this year.

Reported by AI

Following yesterday's initial reports, the California DMV on December 17 officially adopted Judge Juliet E. Cox's decision, giving Tesla 60 days to revise 'Autopilot' and 'Full Self-Driving Capability' branding or face a 30-day sales license suspension. Manufacturing remains unaffected under a permanent stay.

The U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has granted Tesla a five-week extension to respond to questions about its Full Self-Driving (FSD) system amid reports of traffic violations, erratic behavior, and crashes. The probe, opened in October 2025, covers 2.9 million vehicles and includes 62 complaints. Tesla insists drivers must remain attentive at all times.

Reported by AI

The Delaware Supreme Court has unanimously ruled to reinstate Elon Musk's 2018 Tesla compensation package, originally valued at $56 billion and now worth around $140 billion. The decision overturns a lower court's 2024 ruling that struck down the deal due to conflicts of interest. Musk, who criticized Delaware's judiciary and relocated Tesla to Texas, hailed the outcome as vindication.

 

 

 

This website uses cookies

We use cookies for analytics to improve our site. Read our privacy policy for more information.
Decline