Ghislaine Maxwell invokes Fifth Amendment via video in congressional hearing, demanding Trump clemency.
Ghislaine Maxwell invokes Fifth Amendment via video in congressional hearing, demanding Trump clemency.
AI:n luoma kuva

Ghislaine Maxwell refuses Epstein testimony without Trump clemency

AI:n luoma kuva

Ghislaine Maxwell, serving a 20-year sentence for her role in Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking scheme, invoked her Fifth Amendment rights during a virtual deposition before the House Oversight Committee on Monday. Her lawyer stated she would testify fully about Epstein's crimes only if President Donald Trump grants her clemency, adding that she could explain the innocence of both Trump and former President Bill Clinton. The committee expressed disappointment but aims to uncover more about Epstein's associates and victims.

On Monday, Ghislaine Maxwell appeared virtually from prison before the Republican-led House Oversight Committee in a closed-door session focused on Jeffrey Epstein's crimes and his powerful associates. Maxwell, convicted in 2021 of sex trafficking minors for Epstein, whom she met in 1991, refused to answer questions, citing her constitutional right against self-incrimination to protect her ongoing appeal. Her lawyer, David Markus, told reporters afterward that Maxwell is prepared to 'speak fully and honestly' if granted clemency by President Trump. 'Only she can provide the complete account,' Markus said. 'For example, both President Trump and President Clinton are innocent of any wrongdoing. Ms. Maxwell alone can explain why, and the public is entitled to that explanation.'

Committee Chairman James Comer (R-KY) voiced disappointment, stating, 'We had many questions to ask about the crimes she and Epstein committed, as well as questions about potential co-conspirators. We sincerely want to get to the truth for the American people and justice for survivors.' Democrats on the committee, including Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL), questioned the value of the deposition given Maxwell's likely silence but emphasized the need to probe who else abused victims, which financial entities participated, and why officials may have overlooked the scheme. Krishnamoorthi also criticized the Trump administration for withholding millions of pages of documents, particularly financial records, and introduced a resolution opposing any pardon for Maxwell.

Maxwell's proposition drew skepticism. Rep. Suhas Subramanyam (D-VA) called it 'all strategy for her to try to get a pardon from President Trump.' Rep. Robert Garcia (D-CA), the top Democrat, accused the White House of giving her special treatment, noting her transfer from a low-security Florida prison to a minimum-security facility in Texas—dubbed 'Club Fed'—shortly after a July interview with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche. In that interview, Maxwell confirmed ties between Epstein and figures like Trump and Clinton but insisted neither acted inappropriately. She praised Trump as 'a gentleman in all respects.'

Justice Department documents mention Trump and Clinton but contain no evidence of wrongdoing; victims have not accused them. In 2006, Trump reportedly told Palm Beach police chief Michael Reiter that Epstein's actions were known and urged focus on Maxwell, calling her 'evil.' Trump has said he has 'not thought about' pardoning Maxwell but would 'take a look' at her case. The committee plans to depose Bill and Hillary Clinton later this month. Over 1,000 victims seek justice, fueling bipartisan resolve.

Mitä ihmiset sanovat

X discussions feature polarized reactions to Ghislaine Maxwell's refusal to testify without Trump clemency. Democratic figures accuse Trump of orchestrating a cover-up. Pro-Trump users frame it as her offer to exonerate him and Clinton. Skeptics view the demand as potential blackmail or a risky deal.

Liittyvät artikkelit

Dramatic illustration of Epstein files scrutiny on politicians, showing documents, Ghislaine Maxwell in deposition, Howard Lutnick, lawmakers reviewing papers, and New Hampshire political ties.
AI:n luoma kuva

Epstein files trigger scrutiny of politicians and officials

Raportoinut AI AI:n luoma kuva

Recent releases of Jeffrey Epstein files have intensified political fallout, with Ghislaine Maxwell appealing for clemency during a House deposition and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick confirming a 2012 visit to Epstein's island. Lawmakers reviewed unredacted documents, highlighting excessive redactions and victim privacy breaches. In New Hampshire, ties to inventor Dean Kamen, linked to Epstein, have drawn attacks on candidates from the Shaheen and Sununu families.

Ghislaine Maxwell showed up remotely for Congress but zipped her lips tighter than a vault, invoking the Fifth Amendment on every single question. Her testimony wrapped in under an hour, leaving everyone high and dry. But hold up—she's dangling a deal: spill all the Epstein tea if Trump pardons her.

Raportoinut AI

Former President Bill Clinton underwent a six-hour closed-door deposition before the House Oversight Committee in Chappaqua, New York, on his ties to Jeffrey Epstein, denying allegations he 'likes them young,' insisting he saw no abuse, and offering an unprompted defense of President Donald Trump. The compelled testimony, following subpoena battles and Hillary Clinton's prior session, highlighted scrutiny of Epstein's powerful associates amid new details on flights and post-conviction contacts.

Hillary Clinton called on House Oversight Chairman James Comer to conduct her and former President Bill Clinton’s Jeffrey Epstein-related depositions in public, after the couple agreed to appear later in February amid looming contempt proceedings. Comer said the committee plans to release transcripts and recordings and is reviewing whether a live broadcast is legally possible.

Raportoinut AI Faktatarkistettu

Democrats on the House Oversight Committee on Nov. 12, 2025, released three emails from Jeffrey Epstein’s estate that reference President Donald Trump. The messages, dated 2011, 2015 and 2019, have intensified partisan clashes as the House reconvened after a record shutdown and newly sworn-in Rep. Adelita Grijalva added the 218th signature to a bipartisan push to force a vote on broader Epstein file disclosures. The White House dismissed the release as a politically motivated smear.

After a new federal transparency law set a Dec. 19, 2025, deadline for the Justice Department to publish unclassified Jeffrey Epstein-related records, the department released an initial tranche but has said reviewing and redacting the remaining material will take additional weeks. The pace, along with extensive redactions and the appearance of at least one fabricated document in the release, has fueled criticism from lawmakers in both parties and revived online conspiracy narratives heading into the 2026 midterm cycle.

Raportoinut AI

Following last week's partial release of Jeffrey Epstein files, the U.S. Justice Department announced a further delay Wednesday, after discovering more than a million additional potentially relevant records. The move comes after missing a congressionally mandated deadline, drawing bipartisan calls for transparency and an audit.

 

 

 

Tämä verkkosivusto käyttää evästeitä

Käytämme evästeitä analyysiä varten parantaaksemme sivustoamme. Lue tietosuojakäytäntömme tietosuojakäytäntö lisätietoja varten.
Hylkää