Court sets March 19 for ruling on Kindiki's removal from office

A three-judge bench has set March 19, 2026, as the date for a ruling in a petition seeking to remove Deputy President Kithure Kindiki from office. The case was filed in October 2024 by businessman Aura and concerns the process of appointing Kindiki following the impeachment of former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua. The petition claims that the process did not follow the Constitution.

The case was filed in October 2024 by a businessman identified as Aura, who also seeks the empanelment of a five-judge bench to hear disputes arising from the impeachment of former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua. The petitioner noted that the issues raised regarding Gachagua's dismissal are complex, weighty, and unprecedented, requiring broader judicial interpretation.

In submissions before the High Court, lawyer Harrison Kinyanjui, representing Aura, urged the bench to certify the matter for hearing by five judges. He maintained that the amended petition raises substantial constitutional questions regarding succession, impeachment procedures, and legal requirements for assuming high public office.

Kinyanjui told the court that Aura had earlier written to Chief Justice Martha Koome requesting the expansion of the bench, following a Court of Appeal decision that dissolved a previously constituted panel handling aspects of the dispute. The petition stems from the Senate's impeachment of Gachagua in October 2024. After his removal, President William Ruto nominated then Interior Cabinet Secretary Kithure Kindiki to replace him.

Kindiki was approved by the National Assembly and sworn in as Deputy President. However, Aura argues that Kindiki had not formally resigned from his position as Interior Cabinet Secretary when he took the oath, violating constitutional provisions on public office and separation of powers. The petitioner noted that events leading up to Kindiki’s ascension were conducted secretly and violated principles of transparency in Article 10 of the Constitution.

Artikel Terkait

Kenya’s Supreme Court has dismissed former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua’s application to halt his impeachment proceedings in the High Court. The unanimous ruling came from a five-judge bench. This allows the case to proceed without interference.

Dilaporkan oleh AI

The year 2025 witnessed a major constitutional crisis in Kenya's legal sector, with Chief Justice Martha Koome and other High Court judges facing disciplinary complaints from lawyers Nelson Havi, Ahmednasir Abdullahi, and Raphael Tuju. These complaints have triggered investigations and potential removal proceedings. The dispute highlights tensions between judicial independence and accountability.

David Ndii, chairperson of the Presidential Council of Economic Advisors, has downplayed a High Court ruling declaring the offices of President William Ruto's advisors unconstitutional. He described the decision as a pyrrhic victory, insisting that advisors can continue offering guidance informally without state offices. The court nullified the appointments of 21 individuals and all related decisions.

Dilaporkan oleh AI

Kiharu MP Ndindi Nyoro has opened up for the first time about why he did not participate in the impeachment process against former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua, attributing his decision to personal rather than political reasons. In an interview with NTV, he stressed that his choice was driven by religious beliefs and moral considerations. This position resulted in his removal from the chairmanship of the National Assembly's budget and appropriations committee.

 

 

 

Situs web ini menggunakan cookie

Kami menggunakan cookie untuk analisis guna meningkatkan situs kami. Baca kebijakan privasi kami untuk informasi lebih lanjut.
Tolak