Seven ASPS Gender Surgery Task Force members examining open letter questioning age-19 guidelines for gender surgeries.
Seven ASPS Gender Surgery Task Force members examining open letter questioning age-19 guidelines for gender surgeries.
Immagine generata dall'IA

Seven ASPS gender-surgery task force members seek details on how surgeons’ group set age-19 guidance

Immagine generata dall'IA
Verificato

Seven members of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons’ Gender Surgery Task Force sent an open letter asking how the group developed a February 3 position statement advising surgeons to delay gender-related chest, genital and facial procedures until patients are at least 19. ASPS told The Daily Wire it viewed the letter as based on misunderstandings it is working to clarify.

The American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) issued a position statement dated February 3, 2026 addressing gender-related breast/chest, genital and facial surgery for people under 19, and advising that surgeons delay such procedures until a patient is at least 19.

On February 9, 2026, seven people signing as “Concerned members of the ASPS Gender Surgery Task Force” sent an open letter to the ASPS board seeking details about how the February 3 statement was developed. The letter asks for the identity and roles of the authors, the timing and methodology used, and whether the ASPS board reviewed the task force’s anonymized submissions and “areas of emerging consensus.” It says the task force members were unaware a separate position statement was being developed outside the task force and that the statement was released “without input from the Task Force.”

The open-letter signatories listed in the document are Jens Berli, MD, MBA; Rachel Bluebond-Langner, MD; Scott Leibowitz, MD; Steven Montante, MD; Melissa Poh, MD; Asa Radix, MD, PhD; and Loren Schechter, MD (Co-Chair). The letter describes the task force as having been convened following a panel planned for the society’s 2024 annual meeting (PSTM 2024) that it says was later canceled after concerns expressed by members, and it says the task force first convened in May 2025.

The letter also points to what it describes as conflicting internal and public explanations for how the February 3 statement was drafted, citing public reporting that task force co-chair Dr. Scot Glasberg was involved in drafting and quoting a CNN Health interview in which he was quoted as saying: “This was an iterative process that took time, with no outside pressure.” The letter further cites an email it attributes to ASPS executive vice president Michael Costelloe dated February 2, 2026, describing an “urgent, time-limited process initiated by a federal agency” seeking clarification of medical society positions.

In comments reported by The Daily Wire, Dr. Kurt Miceli, medical director of Do No Harm, criticized the open letter and characterized it as politically motivated. The Daily Wire also reported that ASPS said the letter reflected “a series of misunderstandings” that the organization was working to clarify for members.

ASPS’s February 3 position statement says its view has evolved in light of multiple evidence reviews, including the 2024 Cass Review commissioned by NHS England and an HHS report titled “Treatment for Pediatric Gender Dysphoria: Review of Evidence and Best Practices,” which HHS materials say was published in November 2025. The ASPS statement directs members to an evidence summary in an appendix to the HHS report.

The Daily Wire reported that the HHS report criticizes several influential pediatric gender-medicine guidelines for methodological weaknesses and conflicts of interest, and the ASPS statement cites the Cass Review and the HHS report in discussing uncertainties in the evidence base and ethical considerations.

WPATH did not immediately respond to The Daily Wire’s request for comment, according to the outlet.

Cosa dice la gente

Reactions on X to the open letter from seven ASPS Gender Surgery Task Force members questioning the development process of the age-19 surgery guidance portray internal divisions. Journalist Benjamin Ryan reports on the letter circulated by Dr. Blair Peters, amassing over 200 signatures criticizing lack of transparency. Critics, including parents and advocacy accounts, highlight task force members' affiliations with WPATH as evidence of bias, accusing them of ideological motivations. Sentiments are predominantly skeptical of the dissenters, praising ASPS leadership for evidence-based caution.

Articoli correlati

Illustration of plastic surgeons at a press conference announcing delayed gender surgeries until age 19, praised by Trump administration.
Immagine generata dall'IA

Trump administration praises plastic surgeons’ call to delay gender-related surgeries for patients under 19

Riportato dall'IA Immagine generata dall'IA Verificato

The Trump administration has celebrated a new American Society of Plastic Surgeons position statement recommending that surgeons delay gender-related breast/chest, genital and facial procedures until a patient is at least 19. The statement arrives as state and federal actions intensify scrutiny of gender-affirming care for minors, even as other major medical groups maintain their existing, more individualized approaches.

The American Society of Plastic Surgeons has recommended delaying gender-related surgeries for minors until age 19, citing insufficient evidence of benefits outweighing risks. This policy shift follows a $2 million malpractice award to a detransitioner who underwent a double mastectomy at 16. The statement marks a departure from prior medical consensus on pediatric gender care.

Riportato dall'IA

The American Academy of Pediatrics has reaffirmed its support for gender-affirming care for minors, including surgeries on a case-by-case basis, amid shifts by other medical organizations. While the American Society of Plastic Surgeons and American Medical Association have expressed reservations about such procedures, the AAP emphasizes decisions by patients, families, and physicians. This stance comes as detransitioner lawsuits gain traction, including a recent $2 million judgment.

An 11-year review of breast cancer diagnoses from outpatient imaging centers in western New York found that women aged 18 to 49 accounted for roughly one-fifth to one-quarter of all cases, with many tumors in those under 40 described as invasive and biologically aggressive. The findings, presented at the Radiological Society of North America meeting, underscore calls for earlier, risk-based assessment for younger women.

Riportato dall'IA

Advocates opposing gender ideology are pressing President Donald Trump to link federal child welfare funding to policies rejecting such ideology. They have drafted an executive order to redefine child abuse and protect parents who refuse to affirm their children's gender transitions. The effort highlights cases where parents faced investigations or lost custody for their stance.

Proposed amendments to a UK bill aim to restrict children under 16 from using social media and virtual private networks to enhance online safety. Legal experts warn that these measures could require adults to undergo age verification for everyday online services, potentially compromising privacy. The changes build on the Online Safety Act, which took effect in July 2025 but has loopholes that tech-savvy users exploit.

Riportato dall'IA

The SPD has proposed a ban on social media platforms for children under 14 in an impulse paper. The plan includes age verification via the EU app EUDI-Wallet and tiered rules by age group. It draws inspiration from Australia's recent model.

 

 

 

Questo sito web utilizza i cookie

Utilizziamo i cookie per l'analisi per migliorare il nostro sito. Leggi la nostra politica sulla privacy per ulteriori informazioni.
Rifiuta