Jack Smith testifies at House Judiciary Committee hearing on dismissed Trump investigations, amid Republican accusations and Democratic support.
Jack Smith testifies at House Judiciary Committee hearing on dismissed Trump investigations, amid Republican accusations and Democratic support.
AI에 의해 생성된 이미지

Jack Smith testifies on Trump investigations in House hearing

AI에 의해 생성된 이미지

Former special counsel Jack Smith defended his investigations into President Donald Trump during a contentious House Judiciary Committee hearing on January 22, 2026. Republicans accused the probes of political bias and overreach, while Democrats praised Smith's adherence to facts and law. The testimony marked Smith's first public appearance on the matter after two indictments were dismissed following Trump's election victory.

On January 22, 2026, former special counsel Jack Smith appeared before the House Judiciary Committee for hours of intense questioning about his role in indicting President Donald Trump on charges related to the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot and mishandling of classified documents. Appointed in November 2022 by then-Attorney General Merrick Garland, Smith led the cases, which alleged Trump orchestrated efforts to block the 2020 election certification and retained sensitive materials at his Mar-a-Lago resort. Both cases were dismissed without prejudice after Trump won the 2024 election and returned to the White House.

Republicans, led by Chairman Jim Jordan (R-OH), criticized the investigations as politically motivated. "It was always about politics and to get President Trump, they were willing to do almost anything," Jordan said. Lawmakers like Reps. Chip Roy (R-TX), Darrell Issa (R-CA), and Russell Fry (R-SC) targeted Smith's team's collection of phone records from congressional Republicans, including Kevin McCarthy and Scott Perry, around the Capitol riot. Roy noted his records were "indeed targeted" due to communications with Perry, which Smith said occurred before he assumed oversight. Issa compared the tactics to those of Richard Nixon's operatives, asking, "You, like the president’s men for Richard Nixon, went after your political enemies... weren’t you?" Fry accused Smith of an unconstitutional appointment, breaching a 60-day pre-election rule, evidence tampering in the Mar-a-Lago case, and unconstitutional subpoenas of Congress members without court notification.

Smith maintained his impartiality: "I am not a politician and I have no partisan loyalties. My office didn't spy on anyone." Responding to Rep. Hank Johnson (D-GA), he stated, "Our investigation revealed that Donald Trump is the person who caused Jan 6, that it was foreseeable to him, and that he sought to exploit the violence." He added, "We followed the facts and we followed the law. Where that led us was to an indictment of an unprecedented criminal scheme to block the peaceful transition of power." On the Capitol attack, which injured 140 officers, Smith said Trump was "by a large measure the most culpable" and responsible for crimes committed for his benefit. He expressed regret only for not better appreciating his team's sacrifices, many of whom were later fired.

Democrats, including Rep. Dan Goldman (D-NY), defended Smith, with Goldman calling Trump-appointed Judge Aileen Cannon, who blocked parts of Smith's report, "completely lawless." Smith anticipated retaliation from the Trump Justice Department, stating, "I will not be intimidated," and believed it might indict him. During the hearing, Trump posted on Truth Social: "Deranged Jack Smith is being DECIMATED before Congress... Jack Smith is a deranged animal, who shouldn’t be allowed to practice Law."

This hearing followed a closed-door deposition in December 2025, whose transcript Republicans released. Ranking Member Jamie Raskin (D-MD) suggested recalling Smith on the classified documents case, as Cannon's order may lift, amid pushes for the report's release despite Trump's lawyer's objections over grand jury materials.

사람들이 말하는 것

Reactions on X to Jack Smith's January 22, 2026, testimony before the House Judiciary Committee on his Trump investigations are polarized. Left-leaning users and Democrats praised Smith for standing by evidence of Trump's criminal conduct in election subversion and classified documents cases, sharing clips of his firm statements. Conservative accounts claimed Republicans dismantled Smith's credibility, citing rushed pre-election timelines, hearsay reliance, and political motivations. Journalists noted tense exchanges and Democratic requests for additional hearings on the documents case.

관련 기사

Todd Blanche at attorney general confirmation hearing facing senators' questions
AI에 의해 생성된 이미지

Todd Blanche faces tense questions at attorney general hearing

AI에 의해 보고됨 AI에 의해 생성된 이미지

President Trump's nominee for attorney general, Todd Blanche, faced sharp questioning from senators during a confirmation hearing on Wednesday. Lawmakers pressed him on his close ties to Trump and his handling of several Justice Department matters.

House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan has sent a criminal referral to the Justice Department urging an investigation into former special counsel Jack Smith. The move accuses Smith of making false statements during a December 2025 deposition about obtaining text messages from members of Congress.

AI에 의해 보고됨

The Trump administration has brought new indictments against former FBI Director James Comey and the Southern Poverty Law Center as part of what critics describe as a revenge campaign against political enemies. These charges follow previous efforts targeting figures like New York Attorney General Letitia James. Prosecutors have used broad federal statutes and grand jury powers in these cases.

이 웹사이트는 쿠키를 사용합니다

사이트를 개선하기 위해 분석을 위한 쿠키를 사용합니다. 자세한 내용은 개인정보 보호 정책을 읽으세요.
거부