Tribunals deny lack of benefits for judges and appeals judges

A retired judge stated in an STF session that first-instance judges lack cars, health plans, or snacks, but various tribunals across the country denied the claim, confirming aids such as food vouchers, health support, and official vehicles. The statement was made during discussions on restrictions to indemnatory funds for magistrates. The judgment was adjourned to the end of March.

In a Supreme Federal Court (STF) session on Wednesday (25), Claudia Marcia de Carvalho Soares, representing the Brazilian Association of Labor Magistrates (ABMT), defended penduricalhos, extra indemnatory funds paid to judges, claiming precarious conditions for the category. "A first-instance judge has no car, pays fuel out of pocket, has no functional apartment, no health plan, no cafeteria, no water, and no coffee. An appeals judge has almost nothing, except a car, barely has a snack," said Soares, a retired judge from the 1st Region Labor Court who received over R$ 700,000 in net income in 2025, with nearly R$ 300,000 in October, November, and December.

The judgment, discussing the limitation of these funds following decisions by ministers Flávio Dino and Gilmar Mendes, was adjourned to the end of March. In response to Folha de S.Paulo, which contacted 27 State Justice Tribunals, six Federal Regional Tribunals, and 24 Labor Regional Tribunals, several courts confirmed benefits for magistrates.

The Superior Council of Labor Justice (CSJT) stated that the standard is to provide cars for second-degree magistrates, with individualized service in larger tribunals, plus snacks during morning and afternoon sessions and health plans or medical reimbursement. The Rio Grande do Norte State Justice Tribunal (TJ-RN) offers a R$ 2,000 food voucher and health aid from R$ 1,200 to R$ 1,900, with vehicles for appeals judges. In Rio Grande do Sul (TJ-RS), there is food aid, health, and childcare, plus snacks for appeals judges on judgment days, with cars limited to the president, vice presidents, and chief inspector.

The Minas Gerais State Justice Tribunal (TJ-MG) provides health, food, and childcare aids, with the option of car and driver for appeals judges in functional activities. The São Paulo State Justice Tribunal (TJ-SP) has health aid with reimbursement of proven medical expenses up to a limit. The Santa Catarina State Justice Tribunal (TJ-SC) limits benefits to those set by the National Justice Council (CNJ), with vehicles for work travel.

On the other hand, the Mato Grosso State Justice Tribunal (TJ-MT) and Roraima (TJ-RR) stated they do not pay such benefits beyond legal remuneration. The Rio de Janeiro State Justice Tribunal (TJ-RJ) provides armored institutional vehicles to appeals judges and health plans. The Federal District and Territories Justice Tribunal (TJDFT) and Amazonas (TJ-AM) did not detail the aids.

According to Transparência Brasil, indemnities and gratuities often violate the constitutional ceiling, with most magistrates receiving above the limit, especially in lower and intermediate instances. Vitor Rhein Schirato, a USP administrative law professor, called Soares' statement "absurd," questioning why judges wouldn't cover costs like in other professions.

관련 기사

Justice Flávio Dino symbolically suspending extra government benefits across Brazil's executive, legislative, and judicial branches amid salary hike controversy.
AI에 의해 생성된 이미지

Minister Dino suspends extra benefits across three powers

AI에 의해 보고됨 AI에 의해 생성된 이미지

Supreme Court Justice Flávio Dino ordered the suspension of extra benefits known as penduricalhos across Brazil's three branches of government, with a 60-day review period. The ruling aims to curb supersalaries that evade the constitutional cap of R$ 46,366.19. Meanwhile, Congress approved salary hikes and new perks for its staff, costing at least R$ 650 million yearly.

At least one Justice servers' entity, a retired prosecutor and a retired judge voiced support for Minister Flávio Dino's STF decision suspending indemnatory payments created by administrative acts. The São Paulo Court of Justice opposes the measure and quadrupled extras to desembargadores in two years. The case heads to plenary on Wednesday (25).

AI에 의해 보고됨

Centrist leaders in Brazil's lower house want to avoid voting on a bill regulating extra perks and supersalaries for public servants unless President Lula's government engages directly. The Supreme Federal Court suspended these benefits and ordered Congress to legislate within 60 days, but the deadline is deemed too short in an election year. The STF plenary is judging the decisions this week.

The National Council of Justice has heard five complaints of alleged sexual abuses by Judge Magid Nauef Láuar from the Minas Gerais Court of Justice. The accusations emerged after his controversial ruling in a rape case. The judge stated he will not comment on the reports.

AI에 의해 보고됨

STF Minister Gilmar Mendes suspended parts of the 1950 Impeachment Law, restricting impeachment requests for ministers to only the PGR and raising the required Senate quorum. The move prompted an immediate reaction from Senate President Davi Alcolumbre, who defended the Legislature's prerogatives and threatened constitutional changes. The Lula government, through the AGU, requested reconsideration until plenary judgment.

Brazil's National Justice Council (CNJ) received a new sexual harassment complaint against Superior Court of Justice (STJ) Minister Marco Buzzi on Monday (9). The judge, on medical leave since last week, messaged colleagues stating he will prove his innocence and rejecting the claims. His defense criticizes information leaks and claims lack of access to case files.

AI에 의해 보고됨

The British magazine The Economist published an article stating that the Supreme Federal Court (STF) is involved in a 'huge scandal' due to suspicions of ties between ministers and banker Daniel Vorcaro, owner of Banco Master. The piece highlights close relations of judges like Dias Toffoli and Alexandre de Moraes with the business elite. The publication comes amid investigations and debates on creating an ethics code for the court.

 

 

 

이 웹사이트는 쿠키를 사용합니다

사이트를 개선하기 위해 분석을 위한 쿠키를 사용합니다. 자세한 내용은 개인정보 보호 정책을 읽으세요.
거부