House resumes hearing on Marcos impeachment complaints today

The House committee on justice will resume deliberations today on the junked impeachment complaints against President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., paving the way for a committee report to be voted on in plenary session.

The House committee on justice, chaired by Batangas 2nd District Rep. Gerville Luistro, is set to vote on the twin rulings that dismissed the impeachment complaints filed by private lawyer Andre de Jesus and the Makabayan bloc. These were deemed 'sufficient in form' but 'insufficient in substance' under the rules.

Pusong Pinoy party-list Rep. Jernie Jett Nisay, who endorsed the De Jesus petition, along with Reps. Antonio Tinio of ACT Teachers, Renee Co of Kabataan, and Sarah Jane Elago of Gabriela, who backed the Makabayan complaint, are expected to oppose the dismissal. A majority of the committee pointed out that the complaints relied heavily on news articles, which they saw as failing to provide enough facts for a full impeachment proceeding. They highlighted dependence on speculation, policy differences, and unverified allegations rather than direct actions by the President that could establish liability for an impeachable offense.

Lawmakers cautioned against eroding the constitutional standards by accepting hearsay and unsubstantiated claims. The committee's report is slated for submission to the House plenary, where all 318 members will determine the impeachment's fate. A vote by 107 members—one-third of the House—to overturn the report would send the case to the Senate for trial.

Relaterte artikler

House Justice Committee votes 54-1 to advance impeachment complaints against VP Sara Duterte, gavel striking amid documents and vote tally.
Bilde generert av AI

House Justice Committee finds Sara Duterte impeachment complaints sufficient in substance

Rapportert av AI Bilde generert av AI

The House Committee on Justice ruled on March 4, 2026, that the two impeachment complaints against Vice President Sara Duterte—filed in early February and transmitted to the Speaker's office—are sufficient in substance, voting 54-1 to advance proceedings. Duterte has 10 days to respond. Separately, she filed a perjury complaint against former intelligence officer Ramil Madriaga, whose affidavit supported the complaints.

The House of Representatives’ committee on justice has voted to adopt its February 4 report declaring the impeachment complaints against President Marcos insufficient in substance. The vote was 39-4, led by chairperson Representative Gerville Luistro of Batangas. It was added to the plenary session agenda and forwarded to the rules committee.

Rapportert av AI

The House justice committee ruled on Monday that two impeachment complaints against President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. were sufficient in form. On Tuesday, February 3, 2026, the panel will assess if they hold sufficient substance. If approved, the process will advance to notify Marcos.

More leaders in the House of Representatives have dismissed talk of impeaching President Marcos, stating there is no formal complaint or justification yet. Officials describe the discussions as mere rumors without substance for action. The majority in Congress continues to back the president firmly.

Rapportert av AI

Petitioners and endorsers of the second impeachment complaint against Vice President Sara Duterte have withdrawn their support and are now backing the third complaint filed by clergy members and lawyers. This occurs as the House justice committee begins proceedings on March 2, 2026. The move aims to expedite the process toward accountability.

The Supreme Court has ruled that Vice President Sara Duterte's first impeachment case is unconstitutional due to violations of the one-year bar rule and due process. It clarified that new complaints can now be filed immediately. Duterte's lawyers are prepared for potential future proceedings.

Rapportert av AI

The Supreme Court has reshaped how future impeachment cases will be initiated and assessed by ruling Vice President Sara Duterte’s impeachment unconstitutional. In its July 25, 2025 decision, the high court cited the House’s inaction and lack of due process as grounds for voiding it. It also laid down new standards for impeachments going forward.

 

 

 

Dette nettstedet bruker informasjonskapsler

Vi bruker informasjonskapsler for analyse for å forbedre nettstedet vårt. Les vår personvernerklæring for mer informasjon.
Avvis