Tense meeting between US Defense Secretary and Anthropic CEO over AI safety policy relaxation and military access.
Tense meeting between US Defense Secretary and Anthropic CEO over AI safety policy relaxation and military access.
Àwòrán tí AI ṣe

Pentagon pressures Anthropic to weaken AI safety commitments

Àwòrán tí AI ṣe

US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has threatened Anthropic with severe penalties unless the company grants the military unrestricted access to its Claude AI model. The ultimatum came during a meeting with CEO Dario Amodei in Washington on Tuesday, coinciding with Anthropic's announcement to relax its Responsible Scaling Policy. The changes shift from strict safety tripwires to more flexible risk assessments amid competitive pressures.

On February 25, 2026, US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth summoned Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei to Washington for discussions on the company's AI usage policies. Hegseth demanded that Anthropic allow its Claude model to be used in all lawful military applications, including potentially sensitive areas like mass surveillance and lethal missions without direct human oversight. Anthropic has expressed concerns about the reliability of current AI models for such uses, offering instead to apply its standard usage policies to government contracts while prohibiting applications like autonomous weapons or domestic surveillance without human involvement.

Hegseth set a deadline of Friday, February 27, warning that failure to comply could lead to invocation of the Defense Production Act, designation of Anthropic as a supply chain risk, and exclusion from Department of Defense contracts. The company holds a $200 million contract with the Pentagon, and Claude has been utilized in classified operations, such as the January 2026 capture of Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro in collaboration with Palantir.

The same day, Anthropic announced modifications to its Responsible Scaling Policy, moving away from hard commitments to halt model training unless safety could be guaranteed in advance. The updated policy adopts a relative approach, emphasizing risk reports and frontier safety roadmaps to provide transparency. Anthropic cited a 'collective action problem' in the competitive AI landscape, noting that unilateral pauses would disadvantage responsible developers while others advance without mitigations.

Chief science officer Jared Kaplan stated, 'We felt that it wouldn't actually help anyone for us to stop training AI models,' highlighting the rapid pace of industry progress. Chris Painter of METR described the shift as understandable but warned of a potential 'frog-boiling' effect, where flexible safety measures could erode over time. Anthropic maintains it is engaging in good-faith talks to support national security responsibly. The Pentagon is also negotiating with rivals like OpenAI, Google, and xAI to integrate their technologies into military systems.

Ohun tí àwọn ènìyàn ń sọ

X users predominantly express alarm and criticism toward Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's ultimatum to Anthropic, supporting the company's safeguards against AI for autonomous weapons and mass surveillance. High-engagement posts detail threats of Defense Production Act invocation and note the timing with Anthropic's Responsible Scaling Policy relaxation. Sentiments include outrage over government pressure, skepticism about safety commitments, and neutral reporting from journalists.

Awọn iroyin ti o ni ibatan

Split-scene illustration of Anthropic's renewed Pentagon talks contrasting with backlash against OpenAI's military AI deal.
Àwòrán tí AI ṣe

Anthropic resumes Pentagon talks as OpenAI military deal faces backlash

Ti AI ṣe iroyin Àwòrán tí AI ṣe

Following last week's federal ban on its AI tools, Anthropic has resumed negotiations with the US Defense Department to avert a supply chain risk designation. Meanwhile, OpenAI's parallel military agreement is under fire from employees, rivals, and Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei, who accused it of misleading claims in a leaked memo.

Anthropic's CEO Dario Amodei stated that the company will not comply with the Pentagon's request to remove safeguards from its AI models, despite threats of exclusion from defense systems. The dispute centers on preventing the AI's use in autonomous weapons and domestic surveillance. The firm, which has a $200 million contract with the Department of Defense, emphasizes its commitment to ethical AI use.

Ti AI ṣe iroyin

The Pentagon is considering ending its relationship with AI firm Anthropic due to disagreements over safeguards. Anthropic, the maker of the Claude AI model, has raised concerns about hard limits on fully autonomous weapons and mass domestic surveillance. This stems from the Pentagon's desire to apply AI models in warfighting scenarios, which Anthropic has declined.

OpenAI is shifting resources toward improving its flagship chatbot ChatGPT, leading to the departure of several senior researchers. The San Francisco company faces intense competition from Google and Anthropic, prompting a strategic pivot from long-term research. This change has raised concerns about the future of innovative AI exploration at the firm.

Ti AI ṣe iroyin

Anthropic has extended its memory capability to the free tier of its Claude AI chatbot, allowing users to reference past conversations. The company also released a tool to import memories from competing chatbots like ChatGPT and Gemini. This update coincides with Claude's surge in popularity amid a dispute with the US Department of Defense.

On February 5, 2026, Anthropic and OpenAI simultaneously launched products shifting users from chatting with AI to managing teams of AI agents. Anthropic introduced Claude Opus 4.6 with agent teams for developers, while OpenAI unveiled Frontier and GPT-5.3-Codex for enterprise workflows. These releases coincide with a $285 billion drop in software stocks amid fears of AI disrupting traditional SaaS vendors.

Ti AI ṣe iroyin

Anthropic's official Git MCP server contained worrying security vulnerabilities that could be chained together for severe impacts. The issues were highlighted in a recent TechRadar report. Details emerged on potential risks to the AI company's infrastructure.

 

 

 

Ojú-ìwé yìí nlo kuki

A nlo kuki fun itupalẹ lati mu ilọsiwaju wa. Ka ìlànà àṣírí wa fun alaye siwaju sii.
Kọ