Organized labor seen as force against Trump’s agenda

In a re-aired podcast episode, union leader Sara Nelson discusses how organized labor could challenge the Trump administration’s policies. The conversation highlights unions’ unified response to actions on immigration and federal workforce reductions. Originally from April, the episode underscores labor’s potential as a counterweight in 2025.

The Slate podcast "What Next" featured Sara Nelson, international president of the Association of Flight Attendants-CWA, AFL-CIO, in an episode titled "The Flight Attendant Who Wants You to Go on Strike." Re-aired as part of the 2025 in Review series on December 22, 2025, the discussion explores whether organized labor represents a "sleeping giant" capable of halting Trump’s agenda.

Nelson addresses the Trump administration’s moves on immigration and the dismissal of federal workers, which have provoked backlash from diverse unions, including building trades and graduate student groups. The episode questions the impact of labor uniting in opposition: "What happens when labor speaks as one?"

Drawing historical parallels, the podcast description notes, "The same way we got out of 19th century working conditions is how we’re going to keep from going back." This reflects Nelson’s advocacy for strikes and collective action to protect workers’ rights amid potential policy reversals.

Hosted by Mary Harris, the daily news podcast aims to unpack overwhelming news stories. The original April episode captures early concerns about labor’s role post-election, with the re-airing providing a year-end reflection on unchanged dynamics. Production credits include Elena Schwartz, Paige Osburn, and others, emphasizing Slate’s commitment to in-depth reporting.

Keywords like labor, 2025-in-review, and Trump frame the conversation, positioning unions as a vital check on executive power. No specific timeline of events beyond the administration’s actions is detailed, but the focus remains on proactive union strategies.

Related Articles

Illustration of a podcast interview challenging a controversial New York Times headline on women in the workplace, featuring host Mary Harris, guest Danielle Kurtzleben, and contrasting feminist imagery.
Image generated by AI

Slate’s What Next pushes back on New York Times’ ‘Did Women Ruin the Workplace?’

Reported by AI Image generated by AI Fact checked

Slate’s daily news podcast What Next released an episode on Nov. 12, 2025, challenging a New York Times opinion headline that asked whether women had “ruined” the workplace. Host Mary Harris contrasts the backlash to feminism with Beyoncé’s high-profile feminist imagery and speaks with NPR political correspondent Danielle Kurtzleben.

As 2025 draws to a close, commentators on Slate’s What Next podcast say the U.S. economy under President Donald Trump shows signs of losing momentum, even as prices remain high. They argue that tariffs and policy uncertainty are adding to economic pressures and complicating the Federal Reserve’s interest rate decisions.

Reported by AI

A new episode of Slate's What Next podcast examines the potential for a Democratic surge in the 2026 midterm elections amid Donald Trump's second term. Hosted by Mary Harris, the discussion questions whether Democrats can achieve historic gains despite historical trends favoring the opposition party.

In a recent Slate podcast episode, Rep. Adam Smith, ranking member of the House Armed Services Committee, addresses the difficulties of congressional oversight amid current political dynamics. He highlights examples like strikes on Venezuela and ICE operations in Minneapolis to illustrate how oversight has diminished in function. Smith, representing Washington’s Ninth District, shares his views on what Congress and Democrats can do next.

Reported by AI

In a recent episode of the Bar Fight podcast, commentator debated young Democrats Harry Sisson and Chris Mowrey on President Trump's policies. The discussion covered criticisms of ICE raids, tariffs, and the handling of Jeffrey Epstein files, but the participants struggled to propose specific alternatives. The exchange highlighted ongoing political divides ahead of midterm elections.

Civil rights attorney Sherrilyn Ifill argues that Democrats are reluctant to confront racism as a driving force behind Donald Trump’s political appeal, warning that this reluctance could delay urgently needed action. In a recent podcast discussion, she cautions that misplaced institutional trust and a tendency to normalize crisis hinder recognition of unraveling democratic norms, and she calls for a renewed commitment to the ideals embodied in the 14th Amendment.

Reported by AI

In 2025, the US Supreme Court's conservative supermajority repeatedly supported President Donald Trump's expansive agenda, clearing paths for executive actions on immigration, the economy, and electoral power. This alignment, often without explanation via the shadow docket, raised questions about the court's role in democracy. Legal analysts Dahlia Lithwick and Mark Joseph Stern discussed the implications in a year-end podcast, highlighting the focus on voting rights cases.

 

 

 

This website uses cookies

We use cookies for analytics to improve our site. Read our privacy policy for more information.
Decline