Organized labor seen as force against Trump’s agenda

In a re-aired podcast episode, union leader Sara Nelson discusses how organized labor could challenge the Trump administration’s policies. The conversation highlights unions’ unified response to actions on immigration and federal workforce reductions. Originally from April, the episode underscores labor’s potential as a counterweight in 2025.

The Slate podcast "What Next" featured Sara Nelson, international president of the Association of Flight Attendants-CWA, AFL-CIO, in an episode titled "The Flight Attendant Who Wants You to Go on Strike." Re-aired as part of the 2025 in Review series on December 22, 2025, the discussion explores whether organized labor represents a "sleeping giant" capable of halting Trump’s agenda.

Nelson addresses the Trump administration’s moves on immigration and the dismissal of federal workers, which have provoked backlash from diverse unions, including building trades and graduate student groups. The episode questions the impact of labor uniting in opposition: "What happens when labor speaks as one?"

Drawing historical parallels, the podcast description notes, "The same way we got out of 19th century working conditions is how we’re going to keep from going back." This reflects Nelson’s advocacy for strikes and collective action to protect workers’ rights amid potential policy reversals.

Hosted by Mary Harris, the daily news podcast aims to unpack overwhelming news stories. The original April episode captures early concerns about labor’s role post-election, with the re-airing providing a year-end reflection on unchanged dynamics. Production credits include Elena Schwartz, Paige Osburn, and others, emphasizing Slate’s commitment to in-depth reporting.

Keywords like labor, 2025-in-review, and Trump frame the conversation, positioning unions as a vital check on executive power. No specific timeline of events beyond the administration’s actions is detailed, but the focus remains on proactive union strategies.

Liittyvät artikkelit

Illustration of a podcast interview challenging a controversial New York Times headline on women in the workplace, featuring host Mary Harris, guest Danielle Kurtzleben, and contrasting feminist imagery.
AI:n luoma kuva

Slate’s What Next pushes back on New York Times’ ‘Did Women Ruin the Workplace?’

Raportoinut AI AI:n luoma kuva Faktatarkistettu

Slate’s daily news podcast What Next released an episode on Nov. 12, 2025, challenging a New York Times opinion headline that asked whether women had “ruined” the workplace. Host Mary Harris contrasts the backlash to feminism with Beyoncé’s high-profile feminist imagery and speaks with NPR political correspondent Danielle Kurtzleben.

As 2025 draws to a close, commentators on Slate’s What Next podcast say the U.S. economy under President Donald Trump shows signs of losing momentum, even as prices remain high. They argue that tariffs and policy uncertainty are adding to economic pressures and complicating the Federal Reserve’s interest rate decisions.

Raportoinut AI

A new episode of Slate's What Next podcast examines the potential for a Democratic surge in the 2026 midterm elections amid Donald Trump's second term. Hosted by Mary Harris, the discussion questions whether Democrats can achieve historic gains despite historical trends favoring the opposition party.

In a recent Slate podcast episode, Rep. Adam Smith, ranking member of the House Armed Services Committee, addresses the difficulties of congressional oversight amid current political dynamics. He highlights examples like strikes on Venezuela and ICE operations in Minneapolis to illustrate how oversight has diminished in function. Smith, representing Washington’s Ninth District, shares his views on what Congress and Democrats can do next.

Raportoinut AI

In 2025, President Donald Trump's second term was marked by ongoing disputes with legacy media outlets over shaping public perceptions, highlighted in five key moments from inauguration to election scandals. These clashes spanned policy initiatives, interviews, tragedies, and political controversies, revealing deep divisions in how events were framed. A Daily Wire review captured instances where media and administration narratives diverged sharply.

In a Fresh Air interview, The Atlantic's David A. Graham sketches out how President Donald Trump could try to tilt the 2026 midterms — from posting federal forces near polling places to pressuring election officials and even having agents seize voting equipment — while early moves on redistricting and federal monitoring show the ground already shifting.

Raportoinut AI Faktatarkistettu

President Trump’s recent vetoes of two bipartisan measures — one tied to a water-pipeline project and another affecting tribal-related land issues in Florida’s Everglades — have sharpened questions about how he will work with Congress in 2026, according to an NPR interview with Cook Political Report editor Jessica Taylor.

 

 

 

Tämä verkkosivusto käyttää evästeitä

Käytämme evästeitä analyysiä varten parantaaksemme sivustoamme. Lue tietosuojakäytäntömme tietosuojakäytäntö lisätietoja varten.
Hylkää