Photo illustration depicting the demolition of the White House East Wing as a metaphor for threats to the Justice Department under Trump and Bondi, featuring a bulldozer, symbolic justice elements, and references to the Amicus podcast and Vance's book.
Image generated by AI

Amicus episode ‘Demolition Man’ probes threats to the Justice Department amid East Wing demolition

Image generated by AI
Fact checked

In a new episode of Slate’s Amicus, host Dahlia Lithwick and guest Joyce White Vance discuss the Justice Department under Attorney General Pam Bondi and President Donald Trump, using the week’s bulldozer imagery—and the real demolition of the White House’s East Wing—as a backdrop to examine pursuits of political opponents and congressional inaction. Vance’s new book outlines how citizens can help sustain democratic institutions.

The Amicus episode, titled “Demolition Man,” was released on October 25, 2025, with show notes invoking “bulldozers and bulwarks” as Lithwick and Vance assess the rule of law in the current moment. The episode’s timing coincides with the actual teardown of the White House East Wing to make way for a planned 90,000‑square‑foot ballroom—an episode that has drawn widespread scrutiny. (podbay.fm)

Lithwick, a senior editor who writes about courts and law for Slate, is joined by Joyce White Vance, a former U.S. attorney. The show notes frame key concerns in stark terms: “As Pam Bondi’s Justice department chases down the President’s opponents, Congress walks away from its constitutional duties, and the highest court in the land struggles to find a presidential demand too outrageous to rubber stamp.” The notes add, “It’s no wonder many Americans are exhausted by the attempt to toggle between hope and despair.” Bondi’s current role as U.S. attorney general was confirmed by the Senate in February. (dahlialithwick.com)

Vance’s new book, “Giving Up Is Unforgivable: A Manual for Keeping a Democracy,” published October 21, 2025 by Dutton, is presented in the episode notes as “a manual for citizens who understand that surviving this moment (and thriving after it) is a massive team project.” The episode also counsels cautious optimism—“huff a little hopium sometimes, but only if it’s the good stuff.” (books.apple.com)

A member‑exclusive bonus episode released October 26, “Is This Trump’s Most Outrageous Legal Demand Yet?,” focuses on Trump’s bid for a large payout from his own Justice Department and related litigation over the use of federal forces. Public reporting places the compensation request at around $230 million through administrative claims, which the president has publicly discussed. (podcasts.apple.com)

Amicus is billed as “a show about the law and the nine Supreme Court justices who interpret it for the rest of America,” a longtime focus of Lithwick’s coverage. (podcasts.apple.com)

Related Articles

Illustration of the U.S. Supreme Court building with podcast elements and tariff documents, symbolizing a podcast episode on legal challenges to Trump administration policies.
Image generated by AI

Amicus episode spotlights lower-court pushback and a looming Supreme Court tariff fight

Reported by AI Image generated by AI Fact checked

In a Nov. 1, 2025 episode of Slate’s Amicus, host Dahlia Lithwick examines how lower federal courts are confronting key Trump administration moves—on due process and domestic deployments—and previews this week’s Supreme Court arguments over the president’s “Liberation Day” tariffs. According to Slate, the episode also features Rick Woldenberg, CEO of Learning Resources, a lead plaintiff in the tariff challenge.

In a recent Slate Plus episode of Amicus, legal experts Dahlia Lithwick and Mark Joseph Stern discuss strategies for a future Democratic president to repair damage from a potential Trump administration. They argue for using expanded executive powers granted by the Supreme Court to undo harms like mass deportations and agency purges. The conversation emphasizes aggressive action on day one to restore norms and democracy.

Reported by AI Fact checked

In a recent episode of Slate’s Amicus podcast, host Dahlia Lithwick speaks with civil rights attorney Sherrilyn Ifill about the conservative legal movement’s efforts to narrow the scope of the 14th Amendment. The conversation links Donald Trump’s rhetoric and his Supreme Court appointees’ approach to constitutional interpretation to a broader, long-running challenge to Reconstruction-era protections.

The U.S. Department of Justice has opened a civil-rights investigation into a pro-Palestinian protest that surrounded a Manhattan synagogue during an event on Jewish immigration to Israel, after demonstrators reportedly blocked access and chanted hostile and antisemitic slogans. Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Harmeet Dhillon announced the probe on social media, while New York City officials offered sharply contrasting responses.

Reported by AI

A group of U.S. senators has called for an explanation from Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche regarding his decision to disband a cryptocurrency enforcement team while holding significant digital assets. The move, detailed in a memo last April, has raised concerns about potential violations of federal conflict-of-interest laws. The Campaign Legal Center has also filed a complaint urging an internal DOJ investigation.

President Donald Trump's administration is demolishing the White House East Wing to build a 90,000-square-foot ballroom, despite criticism from preservationists over the lack of federal approvals. The project, now estimated at $300 million and privately funded, has sparked debate on its historical impact and necessity. Officials insist it continues a legacy of presidential renovations, while opponents call for a pause in the process.

Reported by AI

President Trump is reportedly eager to invoke the 200-year-old Insurrection Act to deploy military forces against civilians in Minnesota. Legal experts discuss the lack of current authority for such a move and potential consequences if it proceeds. The context involves the killing of Renee Good and concerns over civil rights accountability.

 

 

 

This website uses cookies

We use cookies for analytics to improve our site. Read our privacy policy for more information.
Decline