Haley Kalil is pushing back against her ex-husband Matt Kalil's recent lawsuit, arguing that her comments about their intimate incompatibilities are protected speech. The retired NFL player sued her earlier this month over remarks she made during a November 2025 livestream. A judge has yet to rule on her motion to toss the case.
Oh honey, the tea is scalding on this one! Haley Kalil, the model-turned-influencer who's no stranger to spilling personal deets, is clapping back at ex-hubby Matt Kalil in court. Remember their 2022 divorce? Well, in a November 2025 livestream, Haley didn't hold back, describing Matt's anatomy as the size of two soda cans while praising their loving union. But she doubled down: that girth led to a "specific anatomical incompatibility that rendered a normal sexual relationship impossible," ultimately torpedoing their marriage. 😲
Matt, the retired NFL star trying to stay low-key post-retirement, sued her earlier this month, claiming her "invasive commentary" dragged him into unwanted spotlight and ridicule. Enter Haley's legal filing, obtained by TMZ, where she begs the judge to dismiss it outright. She argues Matt's cherry-picking her spicy comments and ignoring all the glowing praise she heaped on him and their relationship. "We had a loving union that was ultimately hindered by an unfortunate physical incompatibility," she wrote, framing it as truthful autobiographical speech about sexual trauma from a high-profile split.
And get this: Haley insists her words are shielded by the First Amendment, protecting "truthful autobiographical speech, speech describing sexual trauma, and speech about the relationships of public figures." She's not being messy, she says—just honest about what ended their celeb marriage to an NFL icon.
But Matt's team isn't buying it. In a 3:26 PM PT update from TMZ Sports, attorney Ryan Saba of Rosen Saba LLP scoffed: "Haley Kalil's motion to dismiss does not dispute the fact that she wantonly disclosed private and intimate details about Matt Kalil that resulted in widespread ridicule and unwanted attention." They add that "a spouse does not have a right to expose private and confidential marital and sexual details for the purpose of profiting," and they're betting the motion gets denied flat-out. 👀
So, will the judge side with free speech or privacy? This courtroom drama is serving more twists than a reality TV reunion—stay tuned!
