Abortion

Almeida backtracks and denies post-abortion syndrome existence
October 03, 2025 Image generated by AI
Madrid's mayor, José Luis Martínez-Almeida, has backtracked on his stance, now stating that post-abortion syndrome does not exist as a recognized scientific category. This contrasts with support from Spanish bishops and parties like Vox and PP for the concept, despite clear scientific denial. The debate arises amid political discussions on abortion in Spain.
Federal judge strikes down FDA limits on abortion pill
A U.S. federal judge in Maryland ruled that the FDA's restrictions on the abortion medication mifepristone were unlawful, benefiting plaintiffs from three states. The decision blocks requirements for in-person dispensing and a reduced gestational age limit. This preserves broader access to the drug used in most medication abortions.
Federal judge blocks expanded access to abortion pill mifepristone
A federal judge in Texas has issued a ruling limiting the FDA's approval of mifepristone, the primary drug used in medication abortions. The decision revives a long-standing lawsuit challenging the drug's safety and regulatory process. This comes amid ongoing legal battles over abortion access following the Supreme Court's overturning of Roe v. Wade.
Senator Hawley criticizes FDA approval of new abortion drug
October 03, 2025 Reported by AI
Republican Senator Josh Hawley from Missouri has sharply criticized the Food and Drug Administration for approving a new abortion drug, raising concerns about women's safety and the agency's trustworthiness. In a letter to FDA Commissioner Robert Califf, Hawley accused the agency of prioritizing politics over science. The move highlights ongoing debates over abortion access and regulatory oversight.
Federal judge blocks Idaho abortion ban in emergencies
October 03, 2025 Reported by AI
A federal judge in Idaho has ruled that the state's strict abortion ban cannot be enforced in medical emergencies, providing temporary relief to healthcare providers. The decision addresses concerns that the law endangers women by creating uncertainty in critical situations. This ruling comes amid ongoing legal challenges to post-Roe v. Wade restrictions.