South Carolina governor plans special session on redistricting

Republican Gov. Henry McMaster is expected to call a special legislative session to redraw South Carolina's congressional map. The move could create a 7-0 Republican advantage and threaten the seat of Democratic Rep. Jim Clyburn.

McMaster's plan follows a failed vote in the state Senate on Tuesday. Five Republicans joined Democrats to block a resolution that would have extended the regular session for redistricting, falling short of the required two-thirds majority by two votes. Senate Majority Leader Shane Massey led the opposition and warned that altering the map carried political risks. He said on the Senate floor, “I believe that our state is stronger with vibrant parties” and added that Republicans are stronger when the Democrat Party remains viable. Massey also rejected external pressure, stating, “I have too much Southern blood in me to surrender.”

Liittyvät artikkelit

A realistic depiction of the South Carolina Senate chamber where lawmakers rejected a redistricting extension, showing a failed vote tally.
AI:n luoma kuva

South Carolina senate rejects redistricting extension

Raportoinut AI AI:n luoma kuva

South Carolina Republican lawmakers failed Tuesday to secure the votes needed to extend the legislative session and redraw congressional maps, stalling efforts pushed by President Donald Trump to eliminate the state's only Democratic-held House district.

Florida lawmakers approved a new congressional voting map that could help Republicans flip four House seats currently held by Democrats. The map supports President Trump's push for redistricting in Republican-led states. Democrats condemned it as partisan gerrymandering.

Raportoinut AI

Tennessee Republicans voted Thursday to pass new congressional maps expected to eliminate the state's only Democratic U.S. House seat. Republican Governor Bill Lee signed the measure into law shortly afterward. The move followed a Supreme Court decision striking down certain majority-black districts as unconstitutional racial gerrymandering.

Legal fights over congressional maps are accelerating in multiple states as both parties maneuver for advantage before the November 2026 elections. A high-profile U.S. Supreme Court case involving Louisiana’s congressional map could have broader implications for how race is considered in redistricting under the Voting Rights Act and the Constitution.

Raportoinut AI Faktatarkistettu

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6–3 on April 29, 2026, in Louisiana v. Callais that Louisiana’s congressional map (SB8) was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander, concluding the Voting Rights Act did not require the state to draw an additional majority-Black district. Sen. Raphael Warnock, D-Ga., called the ruling “a massive and devastating blow,” warning it could accelerate redistricting fights across Southern states ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.

The Virginia Supreme Court struck down new congressional maps on Friday that voters had approved in April. Democrats are now considering responses, including a radical plan to replace the entire court, though leaders appear unlikely to pursue it immediately.

Raportoinut AI

In the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court's April 29 ruling in Callais v. Louisiana—which struck down a second majority-Black congressional district as racial gerrymandering—civil rights advocates in the Deep South have condemned the decision as a threat to Black representation. States including Alabama, Tennessee, and Louisiana are redrawing maps, prompting vows of lawsuits and midterm mobilization.

 

 

 

Tämä verkkosivusto käyttää evästeitä

Käytämme evästeitä analyysiä varten parantaaksemme sivustoamme. Lue tietosuojakäytäntömme tietosuojakäytäntö lisätietoja varten.
Hylkää