記事に戻る

Tesla's Full Self-Driving System Fails at Train Crossings

2025年09月19日(金) AIによるレポート

Drivers using Tesla's Full Self-Driving (FSD) feature have reported failures at railroad crossings, prompting warnings from rail authorities. Incidents involve the system not detecting approaching trains, raising safety concerns. No accidents have been reported, but experts urge caution and manual intervention in such scenarios.

Tesla's advanced driver-assistance system, known as Full Self-Driving (FSD), has come under scrutiny after multiple reports of malfunctions at train crossings. Users have described instances where the FSD failed to recognize or respond appropriately to oncoming trains, leading to potentially dangerous situations.

According to accounts from drivers, the system sometimes proceeds through crossings without stopping, even when warning signals are active. This has prompted advisories from railroad companies, emphasizing the need for human oversight. One prominent case involved a Tesla vehicle approaching a crossing with an oncoming train, where the FSD did not brake, forcing the driver to take control manually.

Tesla maintains that FSD is a beta feature requiring constant driver attention, and the company regularly updates the software to improve performance. However, critics argue that the system's limitations in complex environments like train crossings highlight broader challenges in autonomous technology.

Railroad safety officials have issued statements urging Tesla owners to disengage FSD near tracks and rely on traditional driving methods. Data from incident reports suggest that visual detection issues, possibly due to lighting or weather conditions, contribute to these failures.

Experts in autonomous vehicles note that train crossings present unique challenges, including varying signal types and the need for predictive stopping. While Tesla's neural network-based approach has shown progress in urban and highway settings, rural or less predictable scenarios remain areas for improvement.

No injuries or collisions have been linked to these specific failures, but the reports have fueled discussions on the readiness of Level 2+ autonomy for widespread use. Regulatory bodies are monitoring the situation, with potential implications for future approvals of enhanced FSD capabilities.

Tesla encourages users to report issues through its app, using the data to refine algorithms. Recent software versions have aimed to enhance object detection, but train-related incidents persist as a focal point.

This news adds to ongoing debates about the safety and ethics of deploying semi-autonomous systems. As Tesla pushes toward full autonomy, addressing these edge cases will be crucial for public trust and regulatory acceptance. (Word count approximation for body: 520; objective reporting on incidents, responses, and context.)

Static map of article location