Florida's Resilient Florida program survives DeSantis cuts

Governor Ron DeSantis is pushing to reduce state spending through a new efficiency initiative, but the Resilient Florida grant program has secured continued funding. Originally set to expire next year, the program was renewed unanimously by the legislature and now draws from gaming revenues. It supports local efforts against flooding and sea level rise amid acknowledged climate vulnerabilities.

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, nearing the end of his second term, is leading efforts to cut government spending, drawing inspiration from the Trump administration. His proposed budget is 10 percent lower than the 2019 budget in inflation-adjusted, per-capita terms. To achieve these reductions, he established a state version of the "Department of Government Efficiency" (DOGE), led by his chief financial officer, who hosts a YouTube show titled "Government Gone Wild."

The DOGE report, released last month, criticized local climate initiatives as irresponsible spending. It highlighted Jacksonville's electric vehicle purchases, St. Petersburg's sustainability and resilience officer, Miami's bus and rail expansions, and Palm Beach County's Office of Resilience, which aims to reduce vulnerabilities from flooding, storms, extreme heat, and saltwater intrusion. The report referenced a federal Department of Energy finding that scientific evidence does not support long-term increases in extreme weather events like hurricanes, tornadoes, and floods.

Despite this, laws signed by DeSantis recognize Florida's vulnerability to flooding from increased rainfall, severe storms, and sea level rise, mandating regular threat assessments. Launched during his first term, the Resilient Florida program has distributed over $1 billion in grants to local governments, which must match the funds. This rivals the Federal Emergency Management Agency's $5 billion Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities program nationwide.

Projects funded include living shorelines at the Pensacola naval base to combat erosion, relocation of a Fort Pierce wastewater treatment plant to avoid high-tide flooding, and in Palm Beach County, raising an island park against sea-level rise and building a $30 million storm drain system—though DeSantis vetoed additional funding for the latter last summer.

Republican state legislator Jim Mooney, representing the Florida Keys, praised the program for requiring shovel-ready projects and matching local property taxes. "The idea is you need to have shovel-ready projects, because getting these grants is hard," Mooney said. In his district, it has financed subterranean drainage pipes to mitigate residential flooding from high tides.

Set to expire in 2025, Resilient Florida was reauthorized last year with unanimous legislative support and no expiration date. It now receives funding from the Seminole gaming compact, allocating $150 million next year. Mooney noted, "I think it would’ve continued to be funded [without the gaming revenue], it would’ve just been more of a rollercoaster ride."

Experts like Mathew Sanders from the Pew Charitable Trusts attribute the program's endurance to Florida's economic reliance on its coastline, including ecotourism and beaches. "There’s a direct connection in Florida between the ecological health of the coastline and their ability to generate revenue," Sanders said. Similar challenges face resilience efforts elsewhere, such as federal pauses under the Trump administration and cuts in Louisiana under Governor Jeff Landry.

관련 기사

Dramatic illustration of Michigan House Republicans canceling $645 million in state project funding at the Capitol.
AI에 의해 생성된 이미지

Michigan House Republicans cancel $645 million in state project funding

AI에 의해 보고됨 AI에 의해 생성된 이미지 사실 확인됨

A Republican-controlled Michigan House budget committee used a rarely invoked provision of state law last week to cancel nearly $645 million in previously approved but unspent state project funding, sending much of the money back to the general fund. The move, which affected programs backed by Democratic Governor Gretchen Whitmer, has drawn sharp criticism from Democrats, who called the cuts cruel, while Republicans defended them as necessary oversight and fiscal restraint.

One year into Donald Trump's second presidency, his administration has undermined clean energy initiatives, including gutting the Inflation Reduction Act's incentives. However, experts highlight that falling renewable prices and surging electricity demand are propelling the shift to clean energy despite federal obstacles. States and cities continue aggressive emission-reduction efforts, creating tension between policy and economic realities.

AI에 의해 보고됨

The second Trump administration has initiated sweeping reductions in federal science funding, affecting public health, climate research, and space exploration. Elon Musk, serving as a special adviser, led efforts through the Department of Government Efficiency to slash government spending. These moves mark a significant departure from decades of US investment in scientific progress.

One year after the federal American Climate Corps was dismantled ahead of Donald Trump's return to the White House, several states have sustained similar environmental service programs through local funding. California and Washington stand out for their ongoing efforts to build green workforces despite national cuts. These initiatives highlight politically viable paths forward for climate-related jobs.

AI에 의해 보고됨

Project NOAH 팀이 정부로부터 새로 10억 페소 자금을 받아 위험 지도를 강화할 예정이며, 더 나은 계획을 위해 다중 홍수 분석을 통합한다. 이 자금은 2017년 6월 프로젝트를 흡수한 필리핀대학교 회복력 연구소 산하다. 자금은 공공사업 및 고속도로부 예산에서 2,550억 페소 삭감분에서 나온다.

U.S. Department of Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins announced more than $500 million in aid for Georgia farmers affected by 2024's Hurricane Helene. The funds address gaps in standard disaster programs, covering replanting and equipment costs from the storm's $5.5 billion economic impact. Applications opened on March 16 and close April 27.

AI에 의해 보고됨

One year into his second term, President Donald Trump aggressively dismantled environmental protections and boosted fossil fuels, slowing U.S. clean energy momentum. However, many actions rely on reversible executive orders amid legal pushback and market-driven renewable growth, limiting their long-term effects.

 

 

 

이 웹사이트는 쿠키를 사용합니다

사이트를 개선하기 위해 분석을 위한 쿠키를 사용합니다. 자세한 내용은 개인정보 보호 정책을 읽으세요.
거부