Threats

Raymond Chandler III, a Pennsylvania U.S. Senate candidate charged earlier this week with threatening federal officials over violent voicemails, was arrested Friday, the FBI said. The charges relate to threats against officials and their families, including urging a lawmaker to assassinate President Donald Trump. A federal custody hearing is set for May 8.

2026년 05월 02일 AI에 의해 보고됨

France's High Commissioner for Childhood Sarah El Haïry announced on Saturday she will file a complaint following threats posted on the forum legarçon.net. The threats came days after she reported platforms suspected of child sex abuse facilitation, including the site. She states the intimidation only strengthens her resolve to fight such crimes.

Diedrich Holgate, recently released from prison for prior threats against Donald Trump, allegedly sent death threats to his probation officer demanding a pardon. The 47-year-old texted that Trump would pardon him or be killed, leading to his arrest. A judge found probable cause for violating supervised release conditions.

2026년 03월 18일 AI에 의해 보고됨

Jacob Hudson, a 38-year-old U.S. Air Force veteran from Muskogee, Oklahoma, has pleaded guilty to two counts of interstate threats targeting FBI Director Kash Patel and his wife Alexis Wilkins. The plea deal drops another charge and stems from social media posts in late 2025 referencing the Jeffrey Epstein case. Hudson faces up to five years in federal prison.

A 46-year-old Florida man faces federal charges for allegedly sending emails vowing to murder President Donald Trump. Markus Edward Hamlett, a former U.S. Marine Corps and Air Force member, sent the threats in May 2025 and made similar statements during a mental health hold. Authorities also linked him to prior incidents in California and an email to the CIA.

2026년 03월 04일 AI에 의해 보고됨

Francisco Mena, a resident of North Richland Hills, Texas, faces federal charges for online threats against President Donald Trump and ICE officers. His lawyers have filed a motion to dismiss, arguing the statements are hyperbolic and protected under the First Amendment. The case highlights debates over online speech and true threats.