Hong Kong court finds Jimmy Lai guilty on all national security charges

Three judges in Hong Kong have convicted media tycoon Jimmy Lai on all counts in his national security trial, which lasted more than a year and a half. Lai denied two counts of conspiracy to collude with foreign forces and one of conspiracy to print seditious articles. Sentencing details will follow written mitigation submissions due in early January.

Three Hong Kong judges delivered their verdict on Monday, December 15, 2025, in the high-profile national security trial of former media boss Jimmy Lai Chee-ying, finding him guilty on all charges after more than a year and a half of proceedings.

The 78-year-old founder of the now-defunct Apple Daily has spent most of the past five years in solitary confinement, an arrangement at his own request, following his denial of bail in December 2020. Lai, a businessman turned opposition activist, is the most prominent figure prosecuted under the national security law imposed by Beijing in June 2020.

The court found that between April 2019 and June 2021, Lai used his news outlet and social media platforms to trigger international sanctions and incite public disaffection toward authorities. He also provided financial backing to the “Fight for Freedom, Stand with Hong Kong” lobbying group to instigate hostile actions by the West.

The three companies he owned—Apple Daily Limited, Apple Daily Printing Limited, and AD Internet Limited—were also convicted under the national security law.

The judge stated that written mitigation will be submitted to the court before 4pm on January 2, 2025, with the sentencing date to be announced as soon as possible. This case highlights the impact of Hong Kong's national security law on media and activists.

ተያያዥ ጽሁፎች

Realistic courtroom scene from Jimmy Lai's Hong Kong national security trial, featuring the defendant, judges, evidence, police security, and international observers.
በ AI የተሰራ ምስል

Jimmy Lai Trial: Courtroom Dynamics, Evidence, and Wider Crackdown

በAI የተዘገበ በ AI የተሰራ ምስል እውነት ተፈትሸ

Following Jimmy Lai’s conviction on national security and sedition charges on December 15, 2025, details from his months-long trial highlight the evidence presented, tight security, international observers, and the case’s role in Hong Kong’s broader clampdown on dissent.

A Hong Kong court sentenced pro-democracy publisher Jimmy Lai to 20 years in prison on February 9, 2026, under Beijing's national security law for conspiring to collude with foreign forces and publishing seditious material. The 78-year-old media tycoon and six former Apple Daily executives were among those imprisoned in a case drawing sharp international condemnation as a politically motivated crackdown.

በAI የተዘገበ

Following Jimmy Lai's conviction on national security charges, as reported earlier, global reactions have intensified. The US and UK demand his release, citing political persecution, while Hong Kong and Chinese officials defend the ruling as upholding the law. Sentencing is pending.

In 2025, Hong Kong's political landscape was shaped by key events, including the halted sale of ports in the Panama Canal by Li Ka-shing's firm and the conviction of Jimmy Lai in a national security trial.

በAI የተዘገበ

The South China Morning Post has published an opinion piece arguing that Western media criticism of former media boss Jimmy Lai's sentencing stems partly from differing standards of governance and journalism, and partly from hypocrisy. The author respects the former but objects to the latter, labeling some critiques as fact-free.

Former Hong Kong lawmaker Lee Cheuk-yan has denied abetting criminal activity by supporting mainland Chinese dissidents, accusing Beijing of false charges against them. He claimed those backed by his alliance should not have been seen as violating mainland law.

በAI የተዘገበ

Two journalists in Sichuan province have been released on bail after accusing a local Communist Party official of corruption. Liu Hu and Wu Yingjiao were detained on suspicion of making false accusations and conducting illegal business operations. The case raises concerns about abuse of power and the shrinking space for media oversight and public expression.

 

 

 

ይህ ድረ-ገጽ ኩኪዎችን ይጠቀማል

የእኛን ጣቢያ ለማሻሻል ለትንታኔ ኩኪዎችን እንጠቀማለን። የእኛን የሚስጥር ፖሊሲ አንብቡ የሚስጥር ፖሊሲ ለተጨማሪ መረጃ።
ውድቅ አድርግ