Hong Kong court finds Jimmy Lai guilty on all national security charges

Three judges in Hong Kong have convicted media tycoon Jimmy Lai on all counts in his national security trial, which lasted more than a year and a half. Lai denied two counts of conspiracy to collude with foreign forces and one of conspiracy to print seditious articles. Sentencing details will follow written mitigation submissions due in early January.

Three Hong Kong judges delivered their verdict on Monday, December 15, 2025, in the high-profile national security trial of former media boss Jimmy Lai Chee-ying, finding him guilty on all charges after more than a year and a half of proceedings.

The 78-year-old founder of the now-defunct Apple Daily has spent most of the past five years in solitary confinement, an arrangement at his own request, following his denial of bail in December 2020. Lai, a businessman turned opposition activist, is the most prominent figure prosecuted under the national security law imposed by Beijing in June 2020.

The court found that between April 2019 and June 2021, Lai used his news outlet and social media platforms to trigger international sanctions and incite public disaffection toward authorities. He also provided financial backing to the “Fight for Freedom, Stand with Hong Kong” lobbying group to instigate hostile actions by the West.

The three companies he owned—Apple Daily Limited, Apple Daily Printing Limited, and AD Internet Limited—were also convicted under the national security law.

The judge stated that written mitigation will be submitted to the court before 4pm on January 2, 2025, with the sentencing date to be announced as soon as possible. This case highlights the impact of Hong Kong's national security law on media and activists.

Artigos relacionados

Realistic courtroom scene from Jimmy Lai's Hong Kong national security trial, featuring the defendant, judges, evidence, police security, and international observers.
Imagem gerada por IA

Julgamento de Jimmy Lai: dinâmicas da sala de audiência, provas e repressão mais ampla

Reportado por IA Imagem gerada por IA Verificado

Após a condenação de Jimmy Lai por acusações de segurança nacional e sedição em 15 de dezembro de 2025, detalhes do seu julgamento de vários meses destacam as provas apresentadas, a segurança apertada, observadores internacionais e o papel do caso na repressão mais ampla de Hong Kong à dissidência.

Um tribunal de Hong Kong condenou o editor pró-democracia Jimmy Lai a 20 anos de prisão em 9 de fevereiro de 2026, sob a lei de segurança nacional de Pequim por conspirar para coligir-se com forças estrangeiras e publicar material sedicioso. O magnata dos media de 78 anos e seis ex-executivos do Apple Daily foram entre os presos num caso que atraiu dura condenação internacional como uma repressão politicamente motivada.

Reportado por IA

Following Jimmy Lai's conviction on national security charges, as reported earlier, global reactions have intensified. The US and UK demand his release, citing political persecution, while Hong Kong and Chinese officials defend the ruling as upholding the law. Sentencing is pending.

In 2025, Hong Kong's political landscape was shaped by key events, including the halted sale of ports in the Panama Canal by Li Ka-shing's firm and the conviction of Jimmy Lai in a national security trial.

Reportado por IA

The South China Morning Post has published an opinion piece arguing that Western media criticism of former media boss Jimmy Lai's sentencing stems partly from differing standards of governance and journalism, and partly from hypocrisy. The author respects the former but objects to the latter, labeling some critiques as fact-free.

Former Hong Kong lawmaker Lee Cheuk-yan has denied abetting criminal activity by supporting mainland Chinese dissidents, accusing Beijing of false charges against them. He claimed those backed by his alliance should not have been seen as violating mainland law.

Reportado por IA

Two journalists in Sichuan province have been released on bail after accusing a local Communist Party official of corruption. Liu Hu and Wu Yingjiao were detained on suspicion of making false accusations and conducting illegal business operations. The case raises concerns about abuse of power and the shrinking space for media oversight and public expression.

 

 

 

Este site usa cookies

Usamos cookies para análise para melhorar nosso site. Leia nossa política de privacidade para mais informações.
Recusar