Republicans call for SAVE America Act after SCOTUS mail ballot ruling

Republicans are urging passage of the SAVE America Act following a Supreme Court decision that permits states to count mail-in ballots received after Election Day if postmarked on time.

The 5-4 ruling allows states to accept timely postmarked ballots arriving late. Missouri Senator Eric Schmitt called the decision "shockingly wrong" and said it was "terrible for election integrity."

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis noted it was "a loss for election integrity" but said his state would continue counting only ballots arriving by Election Day. RNC Chairman Joe Gruters said the ruling made it "even more imperative" for Congress to pass the act.

The bill would require proof of citizenship and add ID rules for mail ballots. Congressman Greg Steube called on the Senate to end the filibuster to advance it.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer praised the ruling and vowed Democrats would block the legislation. DNC Chairman Ken Martin accused Republicans of trying to "rig the system."

ተያያዥ ጽሁፎች

Illustration of the Supreme Court building and mail ballots for a news article on the mail ballot grace period ruling.
በ AI የተሰራ ምስል

Supreme Court upholds mail ballot grace periods in 5-4 ruling

በAI የተዘገበ በ AI የተሰራ ምስል

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday upheld a Mississippi law allowing election officials to count mail-in ballots postmarked by Election Day but received up to five days later. The 5-4 decision rejected a challenge by the Republican National Committee. It preserves practices used in about 18 states and territories.

President Trump has declined to sign a bipartisan housing affordability bill this week, citing the lack of Senate action on the SAVE America Act voting legislation.

በAI የተዘገበ

President Trump abruptly canceled a planned signing ceremony for bipartisan housing affordability legislation on Wednesday. He demanded that Congress first pass the SAVE America Act, his priority elections overhaul bill. The move heightened tensions with Senate Republicans already frustrated by his handling of the Iran War.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 on April 29 that Louisiana's congressional map, which included a second majority-Black district, constitutes an unconstitutional racial gerrymander. Justice Samuel Alito wrote for the majority that Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act requires proof of intentional discrimination, not just disparate impact. The decision, in Louisiana v. Callais, limits race-based redistricting and prompts new maps in several states.

በAI የተዘገበ

The U.S. Supreme Court issued an order on Monday allowing its April 29 decision in Louisiana v. Callais to take immediate effect, bypassing the usual 32-day waiting period. This enables Louisiana to cancel its congressional primaries and redraw maps before the 2026 midterms. The move sparked a sharp exchange between Justice Samuel Alito's concurrence and Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's dissent.

ይህ ድረ-ገጽ ኩኪዎችን ይጠቀማል

የእኛን ጣቢያ ለማሻሻል ለትንታኔ ኩኪዎችን እንጠቀማለን። የእኛን የሚስጥር ፖሊሲ አንብቡ የሚስጥር ፖሊሲ ለተጨማሪ መረጃ።
ውድቅ አድርግ