Camps battle over Sara Duterte impeachment versus energy crisis

Vice President Sara Duterte's camp frames her impeachment proceedings as a political distraction from the escalating energy crisis, while House lawmakers assert they can address both accountability and economic challenges.

The House justice committee began the proper hearing on Vice President Sara Duterte's impeachment case on Wednesday, March 25, 2026. Justice committee chairperson Jinky Luistro addressed the oil crisis directly in her opening speech. “Oil prices are rising. The cost of basic goods is increasing. Ordinary Filipinos feel the weight of daily life more than ever. And yet, even as we undertake this solemn constitutional duty, the House of Representatives does not forget its other responsibilities. We continue working on our other obligations even though there is an impeachment proceeding,” said Luistro, the Batangas congresswoman. She noted the House's approval of a bill authorizing the President to suspend or reduce fuel excise taxes, which Marcos signed into law the next day, March 26. Deputy Speaker Paolo Ortega, who endorsed one of the active complaints against the vice president, stated on Thursday, March 26: “The premise is flawed. Addressing inflation and ensuring accountability are not competing tasks — they are both essential to governance.” In a statement, Sara Duterte said: “The country’s current problems are the looming closure of businesses, job losses, and the hardship faced by every Filipino family due to the continued rise in the prices of goods. Once again, politics is being prioritized over the welfare of millions of Filipinos.” PPP Representative Harold Duterte added: “There is a time for politics, and there is a time for survival. Elections exist to settle political differences. But crises such as this demand unity, urgency, and decisive action.” A July 2025 Pulse Asia survey found two in every three Filipinos believe she should face the impeachment court. Bicol Saro Representative Terry Ridon remarked: “Not only food or livelihood matters to the people. Accountability also matters, and so does justice. Can those be eaten? No. But they still matter to people.”

مقالات ذات صلة

House justice committee holds first impeachment hearing for VP Sara Duterte without her or lawyers present, focusing on procedural agenda and audit evidence.
صورة مولدة بواسطة الذكاء الاصطناعي

House proceeds with VP Sara Duterte impeachment hearing on March 25

من إعداد الذكاء الاصطناعي صورة مولدة بواسطة الذكاء الاصطناعي

The House justice committee proceeds with the first impeachment hearing against Vice President Sara Duterte on March 25, 2026, despite her and her lawyers' absence. The agenda includes ground rules, pending motions, subpoenas, and witnesses for the April 14 public hearing. Officials stress the proceedings are evidence-based from official audit findings.

House leaders stated that lawmakers can tackle urgent national issues while proceeding with the impeachment of Vice President Sara Duterte. Rep. Zia Alonto Adiong emphasized effective compartmentalization of tasks. The justice committee expects to wrap up by late May.

من إعداد الذكاء الاصطناعي

Lawmakers hit back at a Supreme Court petition by Vice President Sara Duterte's allies seeking to block her ongoing impeachment proceedings in the House of Representatives. The move comes after the House justice committee advanced two complaints to hearings.

Vice President Sara Duterte has received an invitation from the House committee on justice to attend its March 25 hearing on impeachment complaints filed against her, her counsel confirmed. The invitation calls for her personal attendance at the Quezon City event. It remains unclear if she will attend.

من إعداد الذكاء الاصطناعي

The House Committee on Justice ruled on March 4, 2026, that the two impeachment complaints against Vice President Sara Duterte—filed in early February and transmitted to the Speaker's office—are sufficient in substance, voting 54-1 to advance proceedings. Duterte has 10 days to respond. Separately, she filed a perjury complaint against former intelligence officer Ramil Madriaga, whose affidavit supported the complaints.

The supreme court has ruled that the 2025 impeachment against vice president sara duterte was unconstitutional due to procedural flaws. This decision does not clear her of wrongdoing but blocks the process for now. New complaints have already been filed by progressive groups.

من إعداد الذكاء الاصطناعي

Petitioners and endorsers of the second impeachment complaint against Vice President Sara Duterte have withdrawn their support and are now backing the third complaint filed by clergy members and lawyers. This occurs as the House justice committee begins proceedings on March 2, 2026. The move aims to expedite the process toward accountability.

 

 

 

يستخدم هذا الموقع ملفات تعريف الارتباط

نستخدم ملفات تعريف الارتباط للتحليلات لتحسين موقعنا. اقرأ سياسة الخصوصية الخاصة بنا سياسة الخصوصية لمزيد من المعلومات.
رفض