Supreme Court to rule on Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam's bail pleas

The Supreme Court will today pronounce its verdict on bail pleas by Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam, along with five others, in the UAPA case linked to the 2020 Delhi riots. These activists have been in jail for over five years, citing trial delays as grounds for release. Delhi Police opposes bail, pointing to the severity of the charges.

On January 5, 2026, in New Delhi, the Supreme Court reserved its judgment on bail applications from Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam, and five other accused in the 'larger conspiracy' case tied to the 2020 Delhi riots, to be delivered today. The bench of Justice Ravindra Kumar and Justice N.V. Anjaria heard arguments from both sides on December 10.

Sharjeel Imam was arrested on January 28, 2020, and Umar Khalid on September 13, 2020. They are challenging a September 2023 Delhi High Court order that denied bail. The accused face charges under UAPA and IPC sections for allegedly masterminding the February 2020 riots, which erupted amid protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act. The violence claimed 53 lives and injured over 700 people.

Delhi Police has opposed bail, describing the riots as a planned 'regime-change operation' aimed at destabilizing India. They cited witness statements, call records, and chat messages as evidence. Police argued that in serious UAPA cases, 'jail is the rule, not bail.' They claimed the accused are deliberately delaying the trial by non-cooperation, despite around 900 witnesses, only 100-150 of whom are relevant.

The defense emphasized prolonged detention and trial delays. The case is still at the framing of charges stage, with the prosecution's chargesheet spanning thousands of pages. The Delhi High Court acknowledged that 'bail is the rule, jail the exception,' but denied relief due to the case's specific facts. Recently, Umar Khalid received two weeks' interim bail to attend his sister's wedding, which has now expired.

Relaterede artikler

Courtroom illustration depicting a federal judge declaring mistrial over defense attorney's political clothing during jury selection in Prairieland ICE shooting case.
Billede genereret af AI

Judge declares mistrial during jury selection in Prairieland ICE facility shooting case

Rapporteret af AI Billede genereret af AI Faktatjekket

A federal judge in Fort Worth declared a mistrial Tuesday during jury selection in the case against nine defendants charged in connection with a July 4, 2025, attack outside the Prairieland Detention Center in Alvarado, Texas, after raising concerns that a defense attorney’s clothing could be seen as political messaging to prospective jurors.

A Delhi court on Saturday granted bail to Shabir Shah, leader of the Jammu Kashmir Democratic Freedom Party (JKDFP), in an alleged terror funding case filed by the Enforcement Directorate (ED). The decision follows the Supreme Court's bail order dated March 12, 2026.

Rapporteret af AI

A plea in the Delhi High Court by the Association for Protection of Civil Rights (APCR) has raised concerns over potential communal violence in West Delhi's Uttam Nagar ahead of the Eid festival. This follows the recent murder of 26-year-old Tarun Kumar during Holi. Locals express unease over social media rumours, amid heavy police deployment.

A Delhi NIA court has convicted Kashmiri separatist leader Asiya Andrabi and two associates under the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA). Andrabi, chief of the banned group Dukhtaran-e-Millat, was arrested in 2018. This marks the second such conviction since the 2019 abrogation of Jammu and Kashmir's special status, following Yasin Malik.

Rapporteret af AI

A Delhi court has directed the framing of charges against two men accused of attempting to attack Chief Minister Rekha Gupta during a public hearing. The court observed that the main accused appeared well prepared with an intention to kill. The incident occurred on August 20 at her camp office.

The Delhi high court quashed look-out circulars issued against NDTV founders Prannoy Roy and Radhika Roy, deeming their prolonged enforcement disproportionate and arbitrary. Justice Sachin Datta ruled that they unjustifiably curtail the fundamental right to travel abroad under Article 21 of the Constitution. The court directed the couple to cooperate fully with the investigating agency.

Rapporteret af AI

The Madhya Pradesh High Court announced on April 2 that it will commence regular hearings on the Bhojshala temple-Kamal Maula mosque dispute cases in Dhar from April 6. The decision follows the Supreme Court's refusal on April 1 to intervene in a Muslim side petition, directing the High Court to address all parties' objections.

 

 

 

Dette websted bruger cookies

Vi bruger cookies til analyse for at forbedre vores side. Læs vores privatlivspolitik for mere information.
Afvis