Families file first U.S. lawsuit over deadly drug boat strikes

Relatives of two Trinidadian men killed in a U.S. airstrike off Venezuela's coast have filed the first federal lawsuit against the government in Massachusetts. The suit accuses the Trump administration of wrongful death and extrajudicial killings in a campaign that has targeted dozens of vessels since September. The plaintiffs deny any drug trade involvement by the victims.

In October 2025, the U.S. launched a series of airstrikes against alleged drug boats off Venezuela, part of a broader effort under President Trump to curb narcotics trafficking. On October 14, a strike killed Chad Joseph, 26, and Rishi Samaroo, 41, both from Trinidad. Trump described the action as "a lethal kinetic strike" and shared a video on social media showing a missile hitting a ship, which burst into flames.

The families of the deceased filed suit in U.S. District Court in Massachusetts, marking the first such case in federal court since the campaign began. They claim violations of the Death on the High Seas Act, a 1920 law holding the government liable for negligence causing death beyond three miles from U.S. shores, and the Alien Tort Statute, which permits suits by foreign citizens for human rights abuses outside armed conflicts without due process.

According to the lawsuit, Joseph and Samaroo were fishermen engaged in farm work in Venezuela, with no connections to drugs, and were returning home when struck. The filing states neither posed "a concrete, specific, and imminent threat of death or serious physical injury" and that non-lethal options existed.

Baher Azmy, legal director at the Center for Constitutional Rights, called the strikes "killing for sport, it's killing for theater and it's utterly lawless." He added, "We need a court of law to rein in this administration and provide some accountability to the families."

The White House defended the operations. Deputy press secretary Anna Kelly stated, "The October 14th strike was conducted against designated narcoterrorists bringing deadly poison to our shores." She noted Trump's use of "lawful authority" against narcotics causing American deaths.

The Pentagon offered no comment on the litigation. The U.S. has conducted about three dozen strikes since September, resulting in over 100 deaths. Lawmakers have questioned the legal grounds, but the administration continues.

Representing the plaintiffs—Lenore Burnley, Joseph's mother, and Sallycar Korasingh, Samaroo's sister—are the ACLU, Center for Constitutional Rights, and Seton Hall's Jonathan Hafetz. ACLU senior counsel Brett Max Kaufman said, "In seeking justice for the senseless killing of their loved ones, our clients are bravely demanding accountability... and standing up against the administration's assault on the rule of law."

Verwandte Artikel

Dramatic illustration of U.S. strikes on a Caribbean drug-smuggling boat, showing a helicopter attacking a flaming, sinking vessel with survivors in the water.
Bild generiert von KI

Lawmakers press for details on U.S. strikes that killed survivors of Caribbean boat attack

Von KI berichtet Bild generiert von KI Fakten geprüft

U.S. lawmakers from both parties are demanding answers about a September U.S. strike on a suspected drug-smuggling boat in the Caribbean that killed survivors of an initial attack, amid intensifying questions over the operation’s legality. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has confirmed he authorized the first strike but says a follow-up attack that sank the vessel was ordered by Admiral Frank Bradley, prompting debate over whether the actions violated U.S. or international law.

The U.S. military says it conducted strikes on three boats accused of smuggling drugs in the eastern Pacific Ocean on December 15, 2025, killing eight people it described as members of designated terrorist organizations. The operation, part of a broader Trump administration campaign against drug cartels, has intensified concerns in Congress over transparency and the legal basis for the use of force.

Von KI berichtet Fakten geprüft

U.S. lawmakers on Thursday viewed video footage of a September 2 military strike on an alleged drug‑smuggling boat near Venezuela, intensifying a partisan dispute over whether a follow‑up attack that killed two survivors complied with the laws of war. Democrats described the images as deeply troubling and potentially unlawful, while Republicans argued the survivors remained legitimate targets.

The Trump administration, through Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, has decided not to release to the public the complete, top-secret video of a September 2 U.S. military strike on a suspected drug boat in the Caribbean, including a disputed second strike on survivors, even as lawmakers from both parties press for greater transparency over the operation.

Von KI berichtet

President Donald Trump has confirmed a U.S. drone strike on a dock in Venezuela, which he claims was used by drug smugglers to load boats. The operation, carried out by the CIA, marks the first known direct action on Venezuelan soil in an escalating campaign against President Nicolás Maduro's government. The strike has raised concerns over congressional oversight and potential risks to civilians.

Die venezolanische Regierung warf der Administration von Donald Trump Bombardements vor, die Caracas in den frühen Stunden des 3. Januar 2026 erschütterten, und behauptete, sie zielten darauf ab, das Öl und die Minerale des Landes zu erobern. Präsident Nicolás Maduro forderte die Mobilisierung der venezolanischen Streitkräfte als Reaktion. Die US-Luftfahrtbehörde verbot Flüge über den venezolanischen Luftraum aufgrund anhaltender militärischer Aktivitäten.

Von KI berichtet

Early on January 3, 2026, U.S. forces executed a large-scale operation in Caracas, capturing Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, who face U.S. charges of narco-terrorism and drug trafficking. President Donald Trump announced the action via Truth Social, stating the U.S. will temporarily run Venezuela to ensure a stable transition. The move has sparked sharp divisions, with Democrats decrying it as unconstitutional and Republicans praising it as decisive.

 

 

 

Diese Website verwendet Cookies

Wir verwenden Cookies für Analysen, um unsere Website zu verbessern. Lesen Sie unsere Datenschutzrichtlinie für weitere Informationen.
Ablehnen