Hong Kong courtroom scene depicting judge exposing eight lies by Jimmy Lai in his national security trial defense.
Image generated by AI

Hong Kong court identifies eight lies by Jimmy Lai in national security trial defense

Image generated by AI

Following Jimmy Lai's conviction on all national security charges on December 15, 2025, the Hong Kong High Court highlighted eight specific lies he told during his self-defense to mislead the court. Details emerged on concealed meetings, editorial instructions, and sanction advocacy, amid expert views labeling Lai a Western proxy while defending Hong Kong's press freedoms.

In the verdict from Jimmy Lai Chee-ying's national security conspiracy trial—previously reported as convicting him on two counts of conspiracy to collude with foreign forces and one count of conspiracy to publish seditious materials—a panel of three judges pinpointed eight lies Lai told during his 52 days of testimony over the 156-day open trial.

These included: concealing the true purpose of a planned U.S. trip (June 24–July 19, 2020) in a June 12 bail application, omitting meetings with U.S. officials (July 4–11); denying knowledge of the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China (IPAC) despite sharing a June 13, 2020, Wall Street Journal article and receiving thanks via WhatsApp; claiming only two editorial instructions to Apple Daily, contradicted by messages urging protest mobilization (April 27, 2019) and student interviews (June 3 and 6); denying funding the illegal 'primary election' despite instructions for voting software (December 12, 2019); disavowing ties to the 'Lam Chau Team' after a January 2020 Taipei meeting and October 24 tweet; initially denying requests for U.S. sanctions in July 2019 meetings with Mike Pence and Mike Pompeo (contradicted by Apple Daily report); covering up approval of Elmer Yuen's May 29, 2020, sanctions video; and claiming his 'Live Chat with Jimmy Lai' show was unrelated to Apple Daily despite staff involvement.

Lai conceded points under questioning by Justice Alex Lee Wan-tang. Consultant Lau Siu-kai described Lai as a Western pawn smearing Hong Kong's judiciary. Executive Council member Ronny Tong Ka-wah called sanction-seeking tantamount to treason under national security laws. Regina Ip Lau Suk-yee noted freedom of expression is not absolute per International Covenant standards, citing coverage of events like the Tai Po fire as evidence of vibrant media. Hong Kong residents protested outside U.S., British, and Australian consulates against Western criticism.

Sentencing is pending after mitigation submissions due January 2, 2026, amid strains on China-UK ties.

What people are saying

Reactions on X to the Hong Kong court's identification of eight lies by Jimmy Lai in his national security trial defense are dominated by pro-Beijing accounts sharing graphics and detailed exposés labeling him a liar and Western proxy, emphasizing exposed contradictions on sanctions, editorials, and foreign collusion. Pro-democracy users criticize the overall verdict as politically motivated without directly engaging the lies claim, highlighting concerns over press freedom and fair trial.

Related Articles

Realistic courtroom scene from Jimmy Lai's Hong Kong national security trial, featuring the defendant, judges, evidence, police security, and international observers.
Image generated by AI

Jimmy Lai Trial: Courtroom Dynamics, Evidence, and Wider Crackdown

Reported by AI Image generated by AI Fact checked

Following Jimmy Lai’s conviction on national security and sedition charges on December 15, 2025, details from his months-long trial highlight the evidence presented, tight security, international observers, and the case’s role in Hong Kong’s broader clampdown on dissent.

Three judges in Hong Kong have convicted media tycoon Jimmy Lai on all counts in his national security trial, which lasted more than a year and a half. Lai denied two counts of conspiracy to collude with foreign forces and one of conspiracy to print seditious articles. Sentencing details will follow written mitigation submissions due in early January.

Reported by AI

Following Jimmy Lai's conviction on national security charges, as reported earlier, global reactions have intensified. The US and UK demand his release, citing political persecution, while Hong Kong and Chinese officials defend the ruling as upholding the law. Sentencing is pending.

A special counsel team sought a 10-year prison term for former President Yoon Suk Yeol on Friday over obstruction of justice and other charges tied to his December 2024 martial law declaration. During the final hearing at the Seoul Central District Court, prosecutor Cho Eun-suk's team criticized Yoon for severely undermining South Korea's rule of law. This trial marks the first of four martial law-related cases to conclude.

Reported by AI

Hong Kong's national security police have arrested a 26-year-old woman on suspicion of participating in illegal military-style drills, following the arrest of nine men for the same offence. She was taken into custody on Friday night and later released on bail, required to report back in mid-January. Meanwhile, two men aged 24 and 25 have been charged with conspiracy to commit subversion, with their case to be mentioned in court on Monday.

Former National Intelligence Service (NIS) chief Cho Tae-yong was arrested on November 12 over his alleged involvement in former President Yoon Suk Yeol's failed martial law imposition. The Seoul Central District Court issued an arrest warrant following a hearing the previous day, citing concerns over evidence destruction. This marks the second arrest of a Yoon administration official in the martial law probe.

Reported by AI

A Tacloban court has convicted community journalist Frenchie Mae Cumpio and lay worker Mariel Domequil of terror financing after six years in preventive detention. The ruling, carrying sentences of 12 to 18 years, has drawn sharp criticism from press freedom advocates as an assault on journalism and human rights. Groups warn it exemplifies the misuse of anti-terrorism laws against government critics.

 

 

 

This website uses cookies

We use cookies for analytics to improve our site. Read our privacy policy for more information.
Decline