Kerala high court takes note of irregularities in Sabarimala Padi Pooja bookings

The Kerala High Court has directed the Chief Vigilance Officer at Sabarimala to secure records related to Padi Pooja bookings amid suspicions of irregularities. A vigilance inquiry revealed unauthorized transfers of bookings made with false addresses. The court emphasized the need for transparency in the highly sought-after ritual.

In Kochi, a bench of the Kerala High Court, comprising Justices Raja Vijayaraghavan V and K V Jayakumar, addressed concerns over the booking process for Padi Pooja at the Lord Ayyappa temple in Sabarimala. The ritual, which involves the worship of the temple's 18 sacred steps, occurs on select evenings following the idol's floral bath, known as pushpabhiskeham. Performed by the thantri in the presence of the melsanthi, it lasts about an hour and includes decorating the steps with flowers, silk cloths, and traditional lamps, concluding with an aarathi.

The court noted that five such poojas take place each month, holding significant religious importance for devotees. Bookings for this ritual have been scheduled as far ahead as 2045, highlighting its popularity and the necessity for a robust system. However, a vigilance investigation uncovered cases where bookings were made using fictitious addresses and then transferred unauthorized for financial gain.

Describing these findings as disturbing, the bench stated, "If true, such conduct is abhorrent and is to be deprecated." An amicus curiae reported that two bookers failed to appear for identity verification, raising doubts about the system's integrity. The court observed that the matter affects not just administration but the sanctity of temple practices.

To probe further, the judges ordered the Chief Vigilance and Security Officer to take custody of all relevant registers and records, including those extending to 2045, and present them in a sealed cover. The next hearing is set for March 4.

Related Articles

A realistic illustration showing the Supreme Court of India alongside scenes of religious devotion, highlighting tensions between law and faith.
Image generated by AI

Supreme court questions judicial review of religious practices

Reported by AI Image generated by AI

The Supreme Court on Thursday expressed concern that frequent judicial intervention in religious matters could undermine India's civilisational identity, where faith remains deeply connected to society.

A nine-judge Supreme Court bench stated on Wednesday that courts cannot hollow out religion in the name of reform and logic may not be the right tool to examine faith and belief systems. The remarks came on the second day of hearing a reference from the 2018 Sabarimala judgment. The Centre disagreed on courts deciding religious practices as superstition.

Reported by AI

India's Supreme Court indicated on Wednesday that uniform guidelines on judicial intervention in faith and rights disputes are neither feasible nor desirable, preferring case-by-case assessments. The observation came during the seventh day of hearings on the Sabarimala Temple entry reference.

Tiruvannamalai Town police arrested a 35-year-old ticket booking agent on Tuesday near the Arunachaleswarar temple for cheating devotees by promising special worship access for extra payment.

Reported by AI

The Supreme Court has directed the immediate removal of encroachers and illegal structures from the Agasthyamalai landscape in South India.

The Supreme Court on Monday directed the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to begin a preliminary inquiry into allegations that Arunachal Pradesh Chief Minister Pema Khandu's family received public contracts worth ₹1,270 crore from January 2015 to December 2025. The order addresses claims of corruption and nepotism in the awarding process.

Reported by AI

India's Supreme Court has agreed to consider a plea by Sanatani Sangsad highlighting violence in West Bengal after the 2021 state polls. The application seeks a high-level monitoring committee chaired by a retired Supreme Court judge to oversee the state's law and order machinery. The bench directed the petitioner to implead the CBI as a party.

 

 

 

This website uses cookies

We use cookies for analytics to improve our site. Read our privacy policy for more information.
Decline