State switches strategy in sami villages' mountain hunting dispute

Five Sami villages have sued the state for the right to allocate hunting and fishing rights in the mountains. The state's representative has changed tactics to counter the demands.

Five Sami villages have sued the state to regain the right to allocate hunting and fishing rights in the mountain areas. The process follows the Supreme Court's 2021 ruling in the Girjas case, which granted rights to Girjas Sami village but left uncertainties for others.

The state's lawyer, the Chancellor of Justice, has switched strategy to try to stop the Sami villages. Lawyer Peter Danowsky argues that the turn shows political influence over the legal process.

Chancellor of Justice Thomas Bull stresses that the JK is the government's representative but does not take direct orders. The case involves broader issues of land use and Sami rights under the constitution and international conventions.

Related Articles

Christian Democrats leader Ebba Busch and rural affairs minister Peter Kullgren propose reviewing reindeer herding's status, reducing reindeer numbers, and no longer treating it as a national interest. The proposal, outlined in a SvD op-ed, faces sharp criticism from Sami representatives and the Green Party.

Reported by AI

Sveaskog has responded to criticism of day card hunting in Malingsbo-Kloten and states that only 17 percent of the area is used for this purpose.

Five fishing companies have filed or plan to file indemnification lawsuits against the Chilean state for nearly $600 million, stemming from quota changes in a 2025 law. The legislation altered the distribution of fishing quotas between industrial and artisanal sectors, impacting licenses under Law 20.657 from 2013. President José Antonio Kast's government has chosen to reform the existing statute instead of pursuing a new general fishing law.

Reported by AI

India's Supreme Court indicated on Wednesday that uniform guidelines on judicial intervention in faith and rights disputes are neither feasible nor desirable, preferring case-by-case assessments. The observation came during the seventh day of hearings on the Sabarimala Temple entry reference.

This website uses cookies

We use cookies for analytics to improve our site. Read our privacy policy for more information.
Decline