Taiwan pushes for stricter penalties in anti-infiltration law

Taiwan's lawmakers are proposing amendments to the Anti-Infiltration Act to impose minimum sentences and tighter rules for political candidates amid concerns over Beijing-linked infiltration. Critics warn the changes could amount to more social control. The proposals come under review following disproportionately light sentences in past cases.

Taiwan's legislature's Interior Affairs Committee reviewed proposed changes to the Anti-Infiltration Act on Monday, January 12, six years after the law took effect in 2020. The amendments address growing government concerns that prosecutions have led to disproportionately light sentences, despite the heavy investigative burden in security cases. Official statistics show prosecutors have indicted 127 people under the law since 2020, with only five receiving final guilty verdicts and average sentences ranging from three to six months—outcomes that Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers say blunt the law's deterrent effect.

Lawmaker Wang Ting-yu, one of 20 sponsors of the amendment, noted: "Investigations into infiltration cases were typically cross-border and covert. As a result, they require far more manpower and resources than ordinary criminal cases."

The proposals also include tighter rules for political candidates to curb Beijing's influence. Critics, including the Kuomintang and Taiwan People's Party, warn that the changes amount to more social control. Enacted to counter Communist Party infiltration, the law highlights Taiwan's ongoing vigilance against mainland threats, though light sentences underscore enforcement challenges.

Related Articles

South Korean National Assembly debate on special insurrection tribunal bill, with ruling party lawmaker presenting amid opposition outrage.
Image generated by AI

Ruling party introduces bill to establish special insurrection tribunal

Reported by AI Image generated by AI

The ruling Democratic Party introduced a bill on December 22 to establish a special tribunal for insurrection cases tied to former President Yoon Suk Yeol's failed martial law imposition. The measure aims to address perceived delays and unfairness in ongoing trials but faces criticism for potential unconstitutionality and undermining judicial independence. The opposition has vowed to launch a filibuster to block it.

South Korea's National Assembly passed a Democratic Party bill on Tuesday establishing dedicated trial panels at Seoul courts for criminal cases of insurrection, foreign aggression, and rebellion. Introduced two days earlier and surviving an opposition filibuster, the legislation raises ongoing concerns about judicial independence and sets a potential precedent for case-specific judicial changes.

Reported by AI

Taiwan's opposition lawmakers have vowed to impeach President William Lai, warning against authoritarian risks. The proposal is largely symbolic, lacking the votes needed for success. It underscores deepening political divisions on the island.

Following Jimmy Lai’s conviction on national security and sedition charges on December 15, 2025, details from his months-long trial highlight the evidence presented, tight security, international observers, and the case’s role in Hong Kong’s broader clampdown on dissent.

Reported by AI

In response to a joint G7 and EU statement condemning Jimmy Lai's national security conviction—as covered in prior coverage—Beijing and Hong Kong authorities issued sharp rebukes, dismissing foreign pressure as futile and reaffirming the rule of law amid ongoing tensions over the city's autonomy.

Rep. Brandon Gill, a Texas Republican, has introduced legislation he calls the Student Visa Integrity Act, proposing shorter visa terms for certain students, new disclosure requirements for institutional ties to China, and broader screening authorities aimed at reducing visa fraud and national-security risks.

Reported by AI

Following the High Court conviction of Jimmy Lai on national security charges, Hong Kong officials, political figures, and professional bodies have voiced strong support for the verdict, dismissing Western portrayals of Lai as a democracy advocate. The ruling rejected claims of political motivation amid criticism from Britain and the EU.

 

 

 

This website uses cookies

We use cookies for analytics to improve our site. Read our privacy policy for more information.
Decline