Former NIS chief Cho Tae-yong arrested outside Seoul court for martial law probe involvement.
AI:n luoma kuva

Former NIS chief arrested over martial law involvement

AI:n luoma kuva

Former National Intelligence Service (NIS) chief Cho Tae-yong was arrested on November 12 over his alleged involvement in former President Yoon Suk Yeol's failed martial law imposition. The Seoul Central District Court issued an arrest warrant following a hearing the previous day, citing concerns over evidence destruction. This marks the second arrest of a Yoon administration official in the martial law probe.

Cho Tae-yong, former head of the National Intelligence Service (NIS), faces multiple charges tied to former President Yoon Suk Yeol's December 3, 2024, martial law declaration. Special counsel Cho Eun-suk's team sought an arrest warrant last week on allegations including NIS law violations, dereliction of duty, perjury, destruction of evidence, creation of false official documents, and false testimony to parliament.

Known as a trusted confidant of Yoon, Cho is accused of failing to report the martial law plan to the National Assembly despite being aware of it before Yoon's televised address. He also allegedly neglected to inform the Assembly after learning that martial law troops planned to detain then-opposition leader Lee Jae-myung and ruling party leader Han Dong-hoon. The NIS Act requires its director to report to the National Assembly and president in cases of significant national security impact.

The special counsel believes Cho gave false testimony to the National Assembly and Constitutional Court, claiming he did not see the martial law decree or related documents at the presidential office and did not witness Cabinet members receiving them. However, CCTV footage shows Cabinet members receiving apparent documents, with Cho handling one.

The November 11 hearing at the Seoul Central District Court lasted about four hours, with prosecutors using 151 PowerPoint slides to argue for detention. Cho denied all charges, stating he felt sorry for not assisting the former president well. He was then sent to the Seoul Detention Center pending the decision.

This is the first arrest of a Yoon administration member in the martial law case since former Interior Minister Lee Sang-min in August. Special counsel Cho's team is investigating various aspects of the martial law attempt.

Mitä ihmiset sanovat

Discussions on X primarily consist of neutral reports from news outlets about the Seoul Central District Court's issuance of an arrest warrant for former NIS chief Cho Tae-yong, citing risks of evidence destruction in the probe into ex-President Yoon Suk Yeol's martial law declaration. Key points highlight Cho's alleged prior knowledge of the plan without reporting it to parliament. Sentiments are mostly factual with no strong positive or negative opinions emerging yet, reflecting the recency of the event. Skepticism is absent in initial coverage, focusing on the ongoing special counsel investigation.

Liittyvät artikkelit

Former President Yoon Suk Yeol in Seoul courtroom for historic martial law sentencing hearing amid media frenzy.
AI:n luoma kuva

Ex-president Yoon to receive first court sentence in martial law trials

Raportoinut AI AI:n luoma kuva

Former President Yoon Suk Yeol will receive his first court verdict this week over obstruction of justice and other charges tied to his short-lived imposition of martial law in December 2024. The Seoul Central District Court has scheduled the sentencing hearing for 2 p.m. Friday and approved live broadcasts due to public interest. This marks the first sentencing among the eight cases he faces.

A special counsel team sought a 10-year prison term for former President Yoon Suk Yeol on Friday over obstruction of justice and other charges tied to his December 2024 martial law declaration. During the final hearing at the Seoul Central District Court, prosecutor Cho Eun-suk's team criticized Yoon for severely undermining South Korea's rule of law. This trial marks the first of four martial law-related cases to conclude.

Raportoinut AI

One year after former President Yoon Suk Yeol's December 3, 2024, martial law declaration, Seoul courts remain busy with related trials. Yoon and his inner circle face charges including leading an insurrection and abusing authority, with key rulings expected early next year. President Lee Jae Myung plans to join a rally near the National Assembly on Wednesday to thank citizens for defending democracy.

A special counsel team announced on Thursday that it has indicted former President Yoon Suk Yeol and five other ex-senior officials over former Defense Minister Lee Jong-sup's alleged flight to Australia last year. Lee faced investigation for interfering in a military probe into a Marine's death in 2023. Yoon is accused of ordering Lee's appointment as ambassador to Australia to help him evade the probe.

Raportoinut AI

The Seoul Central District Court announced on December 16 that it will deliver a verdict on January 16 in former President Yoon Suk Yeol's trial for obstructing justice during his short-lived martial law declaration last December, following the special counsel's indictments earlier this year.

The Seoul High Court on Friday sentenced former Supreme Court Chief Justice Yang Sung-tae to six months in prison, suspended for one year, for abusing power through wrongful interference in trials. This reverses a lower court acquittal on all 47 charges related to judicial power abuse. Prosecutors accused Yang of using trials as bargaining chips with the Park Geun-hye administration to advance his bid for a new appeals court.

Raportoinut AI

Seoul's Central District Court acquitted former top security officials from Moon Jae-in's administration on Friday over allegations they covered up North Korea's 2020 killing of a South Korean fisheries official. The incident involved the official, who went missing from a fishery inspection ship and was fatally shot by North Korean soldiers the next day near the maritime border in the Yellow Sea, with his body burned. Prosecutors claimed a cover-up to avoid straining inter-Korean ties, but the court cited lack of evidence.

 

 

 

Tämä verkkosivusto käyttää evästeitä

Käytämme evästeitä analyysiä varten parantaaksemme sivustoamme. Lue tietosuojakäytäntömme tietosuojakäytäntö lisätietoja varten.
Hylkää