CJI Surya Kant criticizes attacks on judiciary by parasites

Chief Justice of India Surya Kant warned on Friday against growing attacks on the judiciary by unemployed individuals posing as media and RTI activists. He made the remarks while hearing a plea by advocate Sanjay Dubey. The Supreme Court dismissed the plea and called for probes into fake law degrees.

Chief Justice of India Surya Kant, heading a bench with Justice Joymalya Bagchi, heard the plea on May 15, 2026. The petition sought contempt action against the Delhi High Court for delays in applying Supreme Court guidelines on senior advocate designations.

The Chief Justice described certain critics as “parasites in society who attack the system” because they lack employment or standing in the legal profession. He said some turn to media, social media, or RTI activism to target institutions.

The bench dismissed the plea, stating that the senior advocate tag is conferred by the court and is not a status symbol. It also flagged thousands of lawyers with dubious degrees and urged a Central Bureau of Investigation probe, noting possible collusion by the Bar Council of India.

Advocate Sanjay Dubey later apologised and withdrew the petition, which the court permitted.

Artikel Terkait

A realistic illustration showing the Supreme Court of India alongside scenes of religious devotion, highlighting tensions between law and faith.
Gambar dihasilkan oleh AI

Supreme court questions judicial review of religious practices

Dilaporkan oleh AI Gambar dihasilkan oleh AI

The Supreme Court on Thursday expressed concern that frequent judicial intervention in religious matters could undermine India's civilisational identity, where faith remains deeply connected to society.

The Supreme Court on Monday dismissed advocate Nilesh Ojha’s appeal challenging contempt proceedings by the Bombay High Court for his remarks against a sitting judge in the Disha Salian death case. The bench observed that holding a press conference to voice such allegations is unbecoming of a lawyer.

Dilaporkan oleh AI

The Delhi high court observed on Monday that courts cannot prevent people from making fun of public figures unless the remarks are humiliating or disparaging. The bench made these remarks while hearing Patanjali Ayurveda managing director Acharya Balakrishna’s plea seeking protection for his personality rights.

The Supreme Court has revived the Union government's appeal against a Bombay high court judgment that struck down the Centre's attempt to establish a Fact-Checking Unit under the 2021 IT Rules. The restoration came after the government informed the court of its decision to pursue judicial remedies. The appeal had been dismissed earlier due to uncured procedural defects.

Dilaporkan oleh AI

India's Supreme Court on Tuesday dismissed an appeal by the Centre and imposed a ₹25,000 penalty. The appeal challenged a Punjab and Haryana High Court order reinstating a CISF constable. Justice BV Nagarathna rebuked the government as the biggest contributor to judicial backlog.

The Delhi High Court has ruled that aspirants from the Economically Weaker Section (EWS) cannot seek parity with SC/ST/OBC candidates for relaxations in upper age limits or number of attempts in Central government appointments. Justices Anil Kshetarpal and Amit Mahajan noted that the handicaps faced by socially backward and economically deprived classes differ.

Dilaporkan oleh AI

The Supreme Court on Monday dismissed appeals challenging the Madras High Court order directing a CBI investigation into an alleged Rs 397 crore scam involving the purchase of transformers by TANGEDCO between 2021 and 2023.

 

 

 

Situs web ini menggunakan cookie

Kami menggunakan cookie untuk analisis guna meningkatkan situs kami. Baca kebijakan privasi kami untuk informasi lebih lanjut.
Tolak