Employees from the Chaco Ministry of Production, joined by unions such as UPCP and ATE, marched this Friday around Plaza 25 de Mayo in Resistencia to reject the cut to the Productive Stimulus Fund, a salary supplement in place since 2015 that accounts for up to 95% of their income. The protest took place under police custody to prevent disruptions to vehicle traffic. Isaac Chaparro, general secretary of ATE Chaco, denounced an assault on workers' pockets and urged occupying the streets without fear.
The mobilization in Resistencia is part of a conflict triggered by the provincial Executive's decision to eliminate the Productive Stimulus Fund (FEP), deemed irregular by the government, necessitating its modification. Workers argue that this measure entails a drastic reduction in their pay, affecting not only active salaries but also pensions and violating acquired rights.
The gathering brought together Ministry of Production employees, union representatives, and autoconvoked individuals in the Chaco city center. Under police escort, protesters circled the plaza without blocking traffic, highlighting their opposition to the cut.
Isaac Chaparro of ATE Chaco stated during the protest: “They are suffering an assault on their pockets, assaulting their families because when they take away the salary, they take it away from their kids.” He called to broaden the claim: “We are willing to support this claim, not just for this sector, but also for people suffering cuts in health, INSSSEP, hospitals, and all sectors.”
Chaparro stressed collective action: “We have to go out to the street, take over the street; they shouldn't push us away. If they take the street or take this away, we won't claim with fear, we have to lose it.” He added that the adjustment impacts progressively: “Today it hits one sector, tomorrow another. If we stay with arms crossed, it doesn't help,” and assured unions will continue supporting “rain, sun, or whatever.”
This action continues previous assemblies and protests started after the FEP elimination was confirmed. Those involved anticipate sustained union measures and do not rule out legal actions to defend their income.
