Ntlabakanye doping hearing adjourned until late April

The doping violation hearing for Springbok prop Asenathi Ntlabakanye has been adjourned until the end of April after five days of evidence last week. Saids charged him on 9 September 2025 for declaring the non-specified performance-enhancing drug Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) on a medical form, despite no positive test. Closing arguments remain to be scheduled.

The hearing in Johannesburg, which began on 23 March 2026, concluded its evidence phase last Friday. All listed witnesses provided testimony over the week. Saids chief executive Khalid Galant stated that closing arguments are set for the last week of April, pending agreement on an exact date.

"Thereafter, the panel will deliberate and render a decision (hopefully within two weeks)," Galant told Daily Maverick. "The reason for the adjournment is to allow time for parties to prepare closing arguments, in light of the different expert testimonies that were delivered."

Ntlabakanye's lawyer, Barend Kellerman, confirmed the evidence was concluded last week but a date for arguments needs determination by the panel. "The panel will render a decision within (up to) 60 days of the argument being concluded," Kellerman said.

This charge is separate from an earlier Saru announcement on 24 August 2025 about an adverse finding for a specified non-performance-enhancing substance during Springbok duty in July 2025. Ntlabakanye declared the DHEA-containing prescribed drug after clearance from an endocrinologist and a sports doctor for weight issues. Under strict liability rules, his declaration triggered the charge, though the substance did not appear in tests.

Saru noted Ntlabakanye was transparent, acted in good faith, and followed medical protocols, with no Therapeutic Use Exemption applied. He faces a potential ban of up to four years but remains unsuspended and continues playing for the Lions.

관련 기사

South African parliamentary committee wrapping up hearings on police commissioner's Big Five drug cartel infiltration claims, with dramatic testimony and MPs' animated reactions.
AI에 의해 생성된 이미지

Parliamentary committee concludes hearings on Mkhwanazi’s Big Five cartel claims

AI에 의해 보고됨 AI에 의해 생성된 이미지

South Africa’s parliamentary ad hoc committee investigating KwaZulu-Natal Police Commissioner Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi’s claims of a Big Five drug cartel infiltrating the criminal justice system wrapped up witness testimony on 18 March 2026 after five months. Proceedings featured bizarre moments, including references to Brazilian butt lifts and personal accusations among MPs and witnesses. A final report is due by month-end.

The fraud case against South African Football Association president Danny Jordaan and co-accused has been postponed again. This follows the appointment of a new legal representative for businessman Trevor Neethling. The matter will return to court on 14 April 2026.

AI에 의해 보고됨

Legal representatives for suspended prosecutor Advocate Andrew Chauke have opposed a postponement request in the Nkabinde Enquiry probing his fitness for office. The evidence leaders sought a delay due to missing witnesses and recent appointments, but the panel dismissed it. Chauke's case will now proceed on Thursday.

국제형사재판소(ICC)가 로드리고 두테르테 전 대통령의 참여 적합성 항소를 기각한 후, 그의 공소 확인 심리를 2월 23일로 정했다. 심리는 네덜란드 헤이그에서 열리며, 1년 전 마닐라에서 체포된 이후다. 절차에는 마약 전쟁 피해자들을 대리하는 변호사들이 포함된다.

AI에 의해 보고됨

A Mombasa court has granted bond to seven Kenya Defence Forces officers charged with trafficking methamphetamine valued at KSh 192 million. The decision followed the prosecution's admission that investigations remain incomplete. The officers were released on a KSh 500,000 bond each.

As the first trial in the Chromebook corruption case looms on December 23, 2025, Nadiem Makarim's lawyer insists the former minister is still recovering from surgery and cannot attend, clashing with the Attorney General's Office claim that he is healthy. This uncertainty clouds proceedings at the Jakarta Corruption Court.

AI에 의해 보고됨

The office of the state attorney in South Africa has drawn criticism for its reluctance to pay cost orders totaling around R700,000 to conservationist Fred Daniel, following a landmark court ruling against state-sponsored corruption. This delay, amid a government appeal of a R306-million damages award, has led Daniel to enforce asset seizures from the Mpumalanga Tourism and Parks Agency. Internal emails reveal ongoing pressure to settle the payments.

 

 

 

이 웹사이트는 쿠키를 사용합니다

사이트를 개선하기 위해 분석을 위한 쿠키를 사용합니다. 자세한 내용은 개인정보 보호 정책을 읽으세요.
거부