Marcoleta SALN complaint complicates Comelec probe

A complaint referred by the Office of the Ombudsman has caused a slight complication in the Commission on Elections' handling of issues involving Sen. Rodante Marcoleta’s Statement of Contributions and Expenditures. Comelec Chairman George Garcia said the poll body’s Political Finance and Affairs Department has completed its fact-finding probe and is preparing a recommendation. However, a separate complaint has raised procedural questions on case handling.

On Tuesday, the Commission on Elections (Comelec) stated that a complaint referred by the Office of the Ombudsman has caused a “slight complication” in the poll body’s handling of issues involving Sen. Rodante Marcoleta’s Statement of Contributions and Expenditures (SOCE). Comelec Chairman George Garcia said the Political Finance and Affairs Department had already completed its fact-finding probe and is preparing a recommendation.

However, a separate complaint filed before the Comelec Law Department has raised procedural questions on how the case would be handled. “I just want to clarify: the case that is being investigated against Senator Marcoleta is not only a factual issue, but also a legal issue,” Garcia told reporters.

Marcoleta admitted receiving a donation after filing his certificate of candidacy in October 2024. The senator argued that he should not be held liable because he was not yet considered a candidate when the donation was given. The commission is currently reviewing affidavits and documents submitted in the case, including the dates of the alleged donations.

The process became complicated when the Office of the Ombudsman referred to Comelec a complaint involving Marcoleta’s SOCE and his Statement of Assets, Liabilities and Net Worth (SALN). Garcia explained that the poll body only has jurisdiction over the SOCE issue, while matters involving SALN are handled by the ombudsman.

Awọn iroyin ti o ni ibatan

House Justice Committee votes 54-1 to advance impeachment complaints against VP Sara Duterte, gavel striking amid documents and vote tally.
Àwòrán tí AI ṣe

House Justice Committee finds Sara Duterte impeachment complaints sufficient in substance

Ti AI ṣe iroyin Àwòrán tí AI ṣe

The House Committee on Justice ruled on March 4, 2026, that the two impeachment complaints against Vice President Sara Duterte—filed in early February and transmitted to the Speaker's office—are sufficient in substance, voting 54-1 to advance proceedings. Duterte has 10 days to respond. Separately, she filed a perjury complaint against former intelligence officer Ramil Madriaga, whose affidavit supported the complaints.

In the resolution of its probe into Sen. Rodante Marcoleta's undisclosed P75 million Senate campaign donations—previously complicated by a SALN complaint—election lawyer Romulo Macalintal criticized the Commission on Elections' decision to clear the senator. The poll body found no evidence to charge him due to repealed disclosure rules and recommended complaints against his donors instead.

Ti AI ṣe iroyin

House senior deputy minority leader and ML party-list Rep. Leila de Lima said the Commission on Elections should have referred Sen. Rodante Marcoleta’s statement of contributions and expenditures case to the National Bureau of Investigation and Office of the Ombudsman. She noted Comelec absolved him because the offense under Section 109 of the Omnibus Election Code was decriminalized by Republic Act 7166. Still, she said perjury and graft charges could apply.

Senate President Pro Tempore Panfilo Lacson described as “unsettling” the prospect of a Philippine lawmaker echoing China’s territorial positions, warning of grave implications for national security amid escalating global tensions. He raised the alarm following his privilege speech on Tuesday, where he presented evidence that statements from Sen. Rodante Marcoleta on the West Philippine Sea mirrored narratives on the website of China’s ministry of foreign affairs.

Ti AI ṣe iroyin

The House of Representatives’ committee on justice has voted to adopt its February 4 report declaring the impeachment complaints against President Marcos insufficient in substance. The vote was 39-4, led by chairperson Representative Gerville Luistro of Batangas. It was added to the plenary session agenda and forwarded to the rules committee.

Lawmakers hit back at a Supreme Court petition by Vice President Sara Duterte's allies seeking to block her ongoing impeachment proceedings in the House of Representatives. The move comes after the House justice committee advanced two complaints to hearings.

Ti AI ṣe iroyin

The House committee on justice resumed impeachment hearings against Vice President Sara Duterte on April 22, 2026—day three—focusing on her alleged unexplained wealth. Lawmakers reviewed SALNs, SEC records, income tax returns, and heard from summoned witnesses including former Sen. Antonio Trillanes IV and AMLC chief Eli Remolona Jr., following key documents obtained on April 21.

 

 

 

Ojú-ìwé yìí nlo kuki

A nlo kuki fun itupalẹ lati mu ilọsiwaju wa. Ka ìlànà àṣírí wa fun alaye siwaju sii.
Kọ