Transgender Rights
Supreme Court leans toward upholding state bans on transgender athletes in women's sports
Ti AI ṣe iroyin Àwòrán tí AI ṣe
The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments on January 13, 2026, in two cases challenging state laws in West Virginia and Idaho that bar transgender women from competing in women's sports. Justices expressed skepticism about the challengers' claims that the laws violate the Equal Protection Clause and Title IX. Outside the court, hundreds rallied in support of protecting women's sports.
On his Daily Wire show, host Andrew Klavan presented a humorous monologue mocking Supreme Court arguments over transgender athletes in women's sports. The piece targets Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson and features fictional legal scenarios. It highlights the ongoing debate on fairness in competitive sports.
Ti AI ṣe iroyin
The US Supreme Court heard oral arguments in two cases challenging state laws that bar transgender girls from participating in girls' school sports teams. The cases, Little v. Hecox from Idaho and West Virginia v. B.P.J., focus on whether these bans violate the Constitution and Title IX. Justices appeared divided, with a majority seeming inclined to uphold the restrictions.
In an unsigned emergency order on Nov. 6, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration to enforce a rule requiring U.S. passports to list sex as assigned at birth, pausing a lower-court injunction. Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan dissented.
Ti AI ṣe iroyin Ti ṣayẹwo fun ododo
Former collegiate swimmer Riley Gaines and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez traded sharp criticisms on X after Gaines posted a photo from a New York City rally. The exchange highlighted tensions over transgender participation in women's sports and political ideologies. Gaines later challenged Ocasio-Cortez to a public debate.