Allahabad high court rules dm's certificate valid for passport gender change

The Allahabad high court has ruled that a certificate issued by the district magistrate under Section 7 of the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019, serves as conclusive proof for changing gender in a passport. The court stated that passport authorities cannot demand further medical examinations or alterations to the birth certificate afterward. This decision came in response to a petition by Khush R Goel.

On February 10, a bench of the Allahabad high court issued a significant order strengthening rights for transgender individuals. Justices Atul Sreedharan and Siddharth Nandan ruled that a certificate of identity under Sections 5 and 6 of the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019, followed by a revised one under Section 7 after gender-affirming surgery, is binding on passport authorities.

Petitioner Khush R Goel underwent gender-affirming surgery at age 18 and began identifying as male. The district magistrate issued a certificate declaring Goel as male. However, the passport office required a fresh medical examination and changes to the birth certificate for the gender update, leading Goel to file a petition in the high court.

The court held that this requirement contradicted the act and its rules. "We find that the impugned order is in violation of the special act," the bench stated. The act aims to provide dignity, equality, and protection to transgender persons, and administrative hurdles would defeat its purpose.

The court clarified that the district magistrate's certificate resolves the matter, eliminating the need for additional documents to update official records, including passports. Enacted in 2019 after extensive debate, the act outlines a clear process for issuing gender certificates based on an affidavit, processed within 30 days without medical examination. According to the 2020 rules, the passport is among 18 official documents that can be updated using this certificate.

This ruling is expected to ease access to government services for the transgender community without extra obstacles.

Awọn iroyin ti o ni ibatan

U.S. Supreme Court building with American flag and passport overlay, illustrating court decision on sex markers in passports.
Àwòrán tí AI ṣe

Supreme Court allows Trump policy requiring sex-at-birth markers on U.S. passports to take effect

Ti AI ṣe iroyin Àwòrán tí AI ṣe Ti ṣayẹwo fun ododo

In an unsigned emergency order on Nov. 6, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration to enforce a rule requiring U.S. passports to list sex as assigned at birth, pausing a lower-court injunction. Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan dissented.

The Rajasthan High Court has removed portions of its March 30 judgment criticizing the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Amendment Act, 2026, stating they were included by mistake. In an April 2 clarificatory order, the bench said the observations were neither intended nor necessary. The case stemmed from a petition by a transgender woman in the Rajasthan Police.

Ti AI ṣe iroyin

Rajya Sabha passed the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Amendment Bill 2026 by voice vote on March 26 amid opposition calls for wider debate. The Lok Sabha had cleared it on Tuesday. Social Justice Minister Virendra Kumar described it as a symbol of justice for long-marginalised sections.

Meghalaya High Court has permitted quashing POCSO cases in consensual 'Romeo-Juliet' teen relationships. Allahabad High Court ruled that a married person can live with a consenting adult woman. These judgments strengthen personal liberty.

Ti AI ṣe iroyin

A federal judge has struck down the Trump administration's lawsuit against New York's law allowing undocumented immigrants to obtain driver's licenses. The ruling permits the state to continue implementing the Green Light Law, which supporters say enhances road safety. New York Attorney General Letitia James hailed the decision as a victory for public safety and the rule of law.

Days after a special court in Ayodhya acquitted Samajwadi Party leader Moid Khan in the 2024 rape case, police have decided to challenge the verdict in the Allahabad High Court. The court convicted Moid’s servant Raju Khan and sentenced him to 20 years of rigorous imprisonment. The prosecution department will prepare the appeal and forward it to the state government for approval.

Ti AI ṣe iroyin

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh dismissed a petition by former chief minister Mehbooba Mufti on Tuesday, seeking the transfer of undertrials from J&K imprisoned outside the union territory to local jails. The court cited ambiguity and political motives behind the plea. The petition also demanded access protocols for families and lawyers.

 

 

 

Ojú-ìwé yìí nlo kuki

A nlo kuki fun itupalẹ lati mu ilọsiwaju wa. Ka ìlànà àṣírí wa fun alaye siwaju sii.
Kọ