Allahabad high court rules dm's certificate valid for passport gender change

The Allahabad high court has ruled that a certificate issued by the district magistrate under Section 7 of the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019, serves as conclusive proof for changing gender in a passport. The court stated that passport authorities cannot demand further medical examinations or alterations to the birth certificate afterward. This decision came in response to a petition by Khush R Goel.

On February 10, a bench of the Allahabad high court issued a significant order strengthening rights for transgender individuals. Justices Atul Sreedharan and Siddharth Nandan ruled that a certificate of identity under Sections 5 and 6 of the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019, followed by a revised one under Section 7 after gender-affirming surgery, is binding on passport authorities.

Petitioner Khush R Goel underwent gender-affirming surgery at age 18 and began identifying as male. The district magistrate issued a certificate declaring Goel as male. However, the passport office required a fresh medical examination and changes to the birth certificate for the gender update, leading Goel to file a petition in the high court.

The court held that this requirement contradicted the act and its rules. "We find that the impugned order is in violation of the special act," the bench stated. The act aims to provide dignity, equality, and protection to transgender persons, and administrative hurdles would defeat its purpose.

The court clarified that the district magistrate's certificate resolves the matter, eliminating the need for additional documents to update official records, including passports. Enacted in 2019 after extensive debate, the act outlines a clear process for issuing gender certificates based on an affidavit, processed within 30 days without medical examination. According to the 2020 rules, the passport is among 18 official documents that can be updated using this certificate.

This ruling is expected to ease access to government services for the transgender community without extra obstacles.

Artigos relacionados

U.S. Supreme Court building with American flag and passport overlay, illustrating court decision on sex markers in passports.
Imagem gerada por IA

Suprema Corte permite que política de Trump exija marcadores de sexo ao nascimento em passaportes dos EUA entre em vigor

Reportado por IA Imagem gerada por IA Verificado

Em uma ordem de emergência sem assinatura em 6 de novembro de 2025, a Suprema Corte dos EUA permitiu que a administração Trump impusesse uma regra exigindo que passaportes dos EUA listem o sexo atribuído ao nascimento, pausando uma injunção de tribunal inferior. As juízas Ketanji Brown Jackson, Sonia Sotomayor e Elena Kagan dissentiram.

The Rajasthan High Court has removed portions of its March 30 judgment criticizing the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Amendment Act, 2026, stating they were included by mistake. In an April 2 clarificatory order, the bench said the observations were neither intended nor necessary. The case stemmed from a petition by a transgender woman in the Rajasthan Police.

Reportado por IA

Rajya Sabha passed the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Amendment Bill 2026 by voice vote on March 26 amid opposition calls for wider debate. The Lok Sabha had cleared it on Tuesday. Social Justice Minister Virendra Kumar described it as a symbol of justice for long-marginalised sections.

Meghalaya High Court has permitted quashing POCSO cases in consensual 'Romeo-Juliet' teen relationships. Allahabad High Court ruled that a married person can live with a consenting adult woman. These judgments strengthen personal liberty.

Reportado por IA

Uma juíza federal derrubou a ação da administração Trump contra a lei de Nova Iorque que permite que imigrantes indocumentados obtenham carteiras de motorista. A decisão permite que o estado continue implementando a Green Light Law, que apoiadores dizem que melhora a segurança nas estradas. A procuradora-geral de Nova Iorque, Letitia James, saudou a decisão como uma vitória para a segurança pública e o império da lei.

Days after a special court in Ayodhya acquitted Samajwadi Party leader Moid Khan in the 2024 rape case, police have decided to challenge the verdict in the Allahabad High Court. The court convicted Moid’s servant Raju Khan and sentenced him to 20 years of rigorous imprisonment. The prosecution department will prepare the appeal and forward it to the state government for approval.

Reportado por IA

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh dismissed a petition by former chief minister Mehbooba Mufti on Tuesday, seeking the transfer of undertrials from J&K imprisoned outside the union territory to local jails. The court cited ambiguity and political motives behind the plea. The petition also demanded access protocols for families and lawyers.

 

 

 

Este site usa cookies

Usamos cookies para análise para melhorar nosso site. Leia nossa política de privacidade para mais informações.
Recusar