Allahabad high court rules dm's certificate valid for passport gender change

The Allahabad high court has ruled that a certificate issued by the district magistrate under Section 7 of the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019, serves as conclusive proof for changing gender in a passport. The court stated that passport authorities cannot demand further medical examinations or alterations to the birth certificate afterward. This decision came in response to a petition by Khush R Goel.

On February 10, a bench of the Allahabad high court issued a significant order strengthening rights for transgender individuals. Justices Atul Sreedharan and Siddharth Nandan ruled that a certificate of identity under Sections 5 and 6 of the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019, followed by a revised one under Section 7 after gender-affirming surgery, is binding on passport authorities.

Petitioner Khush R Goel underwent gender-affirming surgery at age 18 and began identifying as male. The district magistrate issued a certificate declaring Goel as male. However, the passport office required a fresh medical examination and changes to the birth certificate for the gender update, leading Goel to file a petition in the high court.

The court held that this requirement contradicted the act and its rules. "We find that the impugned order is in violation of the special act," the bench stated. The act aims to provide dignity, equality, and protection to transgender persons, and administrative hurdles would defeat its purpose.

The court clarified that the district magistrate's certificate resolves the matter, eliminating the need for additional documents to update official records, including passports. Enacted in 2019 after extensive debate, the act outlines a clear process for issuing gender certificates based on an affidavit, processed within 30 days without medical examination. According to the 2020 rules, the passport is among 18 official documents that can be updated using this certificate.

This ruling is expected to ease access to government services for the transgender community without extra obstacles.

관련 기사

A Rhode Island judge blocks a DOJ subpoena seeking transgender youth medical records in a federal courtroom.
AI에 의해 생성된 이미지

Rhode Island judge blocks DOJ subpoena seeking transgender youth patient data; Texas enforcement order at center of dispute

AI에 의해 보고됨 AI에 의해 생성된 이미지 사실 확인됨

A federal judge in Rhode Island has quashed a U.S. Justice Department administrative subpoena that sought identifying information and medical records for minors who received gender-affirming care at Rhode Island Hospital. The ruling criticized DOJ lawyers’ handling of the case and highlighted the government’s effort to pursue enforcement in a Texas federal court.

The Ministry of External Affairs stated that a passport is a travel document and not proof of citizenship, drawing sharp reactions from Kapil Sibal and Javed Akhtar.

AI에 의해 보고됨

Many transgender persons in Delhi continue to face difficulties obtaining Saheli cards for free bus travel three months after the scheme began, even though the cards list them as eligible.

The Texas Supreme Court last week allowed Soren Aldaco to proceed with a medical malpractice lawsuit against her former therapist and Three Oaks Counseling. The unanimous decision addresses the statute of limitations for cases involving minors who underwent gender transition procedures.

AI에 의해 보고됨

A 27-year-old man from Hardoi district was caught in Bareilly impersonating another candidate during the Home Guard recruitment exam's biometric verification on Sunday. Identified as Anurag, he had also taken the test for someone else the previous day. Police arrested him and registered a case under cheating and forgery laws.

The Supreme Court has quashed a criminal case pending trial in Prayagraj since 1991, stressing that quick justice is essential under Article 21 of the Constitution.

AI에 의해 보고됨

The Allahabad High Court ruled on Tuesday that second maternity leave cannot be denied on the ground of a two-year gap between children. Justice Karunesh Singh Pawar delivered the judgment in Manisha Yadav's case.

 

 

 

이 웹사이트는 쿠키를 사용합니다

사이트를 개선하기 위해 분석을 위한 쿠키를 사용합니다. 자세한 내용은 개인정보 보호 정책을 읽으세요.
거부