Allahabad high court rules dm's certificate valid for passport gender change

The Allahabad high court has ruled that a certificate issued by the district magistrate under Section 7 of the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019, serves as conclusive proof for changing gender in a passport. The court stated that passport authorities cannot demand further medical examinations or alterations to the birth certificate afterward. This decision came in response to a petition by Khush R Goel.

On February 10, a bench of the Allahabad high court issued a significant order strengthening rights for transgender individuals. Justices Atul Sreedharan and Siddharth Nandan ruled that a certificate of identity under Sections 5 and 6 of the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019, followed by a revised one under Section 7 after gender-affirming surgery, is binding on passport authorities.

Petitioner Khush R Goel underwent gender-affirming surgery at age 18 and began identifying as male. The district magistrate issued a certificate declaring Goel as male. However, the passport office required a fresh medical examination and changes to the birth certificate for the gender update, leading Goel to file a petition in the high court.

The court held that this requirement contradicted the act and its rules. "We find that the impugned order is in violation of the special act," the bench stated. The act aims to provide dignity, equality, and protection to transgender persons, and administrative hurdles would defeat its purpose.

The court clarified that the district magistrate's certificate resolves the matter, eliminating the need for additional documents to update official records, including passports. Enacted in 2019 after extensive debate, the act outlines a clear process for issuing gender certificates based on an affidavit, processed within 30 days without medical examination. According to the 2020 rules, the passport is among 18 official documents that can be updated using this certificate.

This ruling is expected to ease access to government services for the transgender community without extra obstacles.

関連記事

A Rhode Island judge blocks a DOJ subpoena seeking transgender youth medical records in a federal courtroom.
AIによって生成された画像

米ロードアイランド州の判事、トランスジェンダーの未成年患者データに関する司法省の召喚状を差し止め:テキサス州の強制執行命令が争点に

AIによるレポート AIによって生成された画像 事実確認済み

米ロードアイランド州の連邦地方裁判所判事は、ロードアイランド病院で性別適合ケアを受けた未成年者の個人識別情報や医療記録を求めていた米司法省の行政召喚状を取り消す決定を下した。同判事は、司法省側の弁護士による訴訟対応を批判し、テキサス州の連邦裁判所で強制執行を図った政府の姿勢を指摘した。

The Rajasthan High Court has removed portions of its March 30 judgment criticizing the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Amendment Act, 2026, stating they were included by mistake. In an April 2 clarificatory order, the bench said the observations were neither intended nor necessary. The case stemmed from a petition by a transgender woman in the Rajasthan Police.

AIによるレポート

The Ministry of External Affairs stated that a passport is a travel document and not proof of citizenship, drawing sharp reactions from Kapil Sibal and Javed Akhtar.

The Karnataka high court has upheld the state government's cancellation of recognition for a private school that had operated for 20 years on a fake certificate. Authorities found the managing society ran multiple schools under one certificate, diverted fees to unregistered accounts, and illegally operated a madrasa on campus. The education department revoked recognition on May 30, 2025, with the appellate authority endorsing it in January 2026.

AIによるレポート

Meghalaya High Court has permitted quashing POCSO cases in consensual 'Romeo-Juliet' teen relationships. Allahabad High Court ruled that a married person can live with a consenting adult woman. These judgments strengthen personal liberty.

米国連邦刑務所局(BOP)は2026年2月19日、「性別違和のある収容者の管理」と題する新しいプログラム声明を発表しました。同声明は、性別違和を精神疾患の診断基準『DSM-5-TR』に基づく診断と位置づけ、ジェンダー・アイデンティティを「生物学的な現実や性別とは切り離されたもの」と定義する精神保健上の「評価・治療」指針を定めています。擁護団体は、この方針により性別適合ホルモン療法が終了または制限され、性別適合のための私物撤去が求められる可能性があると指摘していますが、裁判所は「Kingdom対トランプ事件」において、訴訟継続中もホルモン療法および一定の配慮を継続するようBOPに命じています。

AIによるレポート

The Madhya Pradesh High Court has ruled that compassionate appointment is not a heritable property right. In a dispute between a son and a married daughter over a government employee's job after his death, priority went to the son. The court deemed the demand for a succession certificate arbitrary.

 

 

 

このウェブサイトはCookieを使用します

サイトを改善するための分析にCookieを使用します。詳細については、プライバシーポリシーをお読みください。
拒否