全球治理需反映新现实的意见文章发布

尽管国际紧张局势加剧,各国仍寻求基于共同利益的合作。南华早报发表的一篇评论文章认为,多边机构必须顺应这一趋势,适应当今的经济分散、环境制约和政治碎片化世界。

南华早报于2026年2月20日发表的意见文章《全球治理需反映新现实》指出,现行国际秩序是为冷战时期的两极对抗和随后美国的霸权主导设计的。然而,当今全球体系已大不相同:经济分散、环境受限、政治碎片化,但通过贸易和技术深度互联。

文章提到,西方国家兴起的民粹主义试图拆除被视为阻碍国家繁荣的多边结构。尽管如此,多边机构仍固守过去的权力分配,而当今挑战——如气候变化、数字碎片化、供应链不安全、债务困境和地缘政治竞争——要求框架反映当代现实。全球治理难以跟上这些变化。

该旧架构是为钢铁、谷物和领土主权的时代构建的。现在,它面对数据流动、人工智能、跨境平台、大气物理和全球一体化资本市场驱动的问题。治理仍以国家为中心,而价值创造和系统风险日益超越国界和部门。

文章强调,尽管紧张局势存在,各国仍寻求合作,机构需拥抱这一趋势。关键词包括亚洲、美国、慕尼黑、加拿大、跨太平洋伙伴关系、CPTPP、联合国、英国、世界贸易组织、中国、格陵兰、冷战、欧盟和北约。

相关文章

In the emerging world order, Europe and China's interests align, allowing Brussels and Beijing to reshape global power into a balance where Europe matters and China gains legitimacy as a responsible power. Pragmatic engagement, not moral posturing, is the only way Europe can regain relevance, while a stronger Europe offers China a credible partner in strategic and economic arenas.

由 AI 报道

An author attending the Asia Leaders Series in Zurich, Switzerland, suggests the US and China could cooperate on AI risks, similar to their 1972 alignment against a shared threat. The forum's discussions revealed that current global strains are normal rather than exceptional.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney delivered a pointed speech highlighting a rupture in the world order, where great powers are weaponizing economic ties. He urged middle powers like Canada to diversify partnerships beyond the unreliable American-led system. The address implicitly targets recent US actions under President Donald Trump.

由 AI 报道

China's international clout and economic stability are rebalancing its relations with Europe, focusing more on cooperation and less on rivalry, according to former ambassador Wu Ken. European leaders have made a flurry of visits to Beijing in recent months amid US tariff threats and a push to acquire Greenland. Since 2019, the European Union has defined China as a cooperation partner, economic competitor, and systemic rival.

 

 

 

此网站使用 cookie

我们使用 cookie 进行分析以改进我们的网站。阅读我们的 隐私政策 以获取更多信息。
拒绝