U.S. interventions in Latin America trace back to Monroe Doctrine

President Trump's pressure campaign against Venezuela's Nicolás Maduro continues a long tradition of U.S. involvement in the region, rooted in the 1823 Monroe Doctrine. This history includes both covert and overt actions aimed at protecting American interests and countering perceived threats like communism. While some interventions achieved short-term goals, many led to unintended consequences and mixed outcomes.

The Monroe Doctrine, announced by President James Monroe in 1823, initially warned European powers against interfering in the Western Hemisphere. President Theodore Roosevelt later expanded it into the "Big Stick" policy, justifying unilateral U.S. actions as a regional policeman to advance interests, including military force alongside diplomacy.

After World War II, U.S. focus shifted to combating communism, intensified by Fidel Castro's 1959 Cuban Revolution. "During the Cold War, intervention was mostly covert. In the 1980s, you begin to see more overt actions," notes Eduardo Gamarra, a professor at Florida International University. This era emphasized strategic denial, deterring foreign influences—from Europeans in the 19th century to the Soviet Union postwar.

Edward Murphy, a history professor at Michigan State University, explains that the U.S. and right-wing Latin American governments viewed communism as a non-indigenous ideology to be eradicated under the Monroe Doctrine's logic.

Key examples illustrate the varied results:
- In 1954, the CIA orchestrated a coup in Guatemala against President Jacobo Árbenz over land reforms affecting the United Fruit Company, installing authoritarian rule and inspiring repression elsewhere.
- The 1961 Bay of Pigs invasion failed to topple Castro, prompting the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis and a lasting U.S. embargo that strengthened Cuba's ties with Russia.
- Operation Urgent Fury in Grenada (1983) ousted a Marxist government, protecting U.S. students and leading to stable democracy.
- Reagan's support for Nicaraguan Contras against Daniel Ortega's Sandinistas sparked the Iran-Contra scandal; Ortega later won elections and shifted to authoritarian rule.
- The 1989 invasion of Panama removed Gen. Manuel Noriega amid drug ties, fostering economic growth and democracy, though debated as truly successful.

By the mid-1980s, U.S. policy pivoted to the drug war. Recent actions against Venezuela, including strikes on drug boats and oil tanker seizures, echo this interventionist legacy, often yielding complex legacies rather than clear victories.

Related Articles

Illustration of Maduro's U.S. capture dividing Latin American leaders and publics, with poll data highlighting public support in Colombia and Chile.
Image generated by AI

Latin American Polls and Geopolitical Shifts After U.S. Capture of Maduro

Reported by AI Image generated by AI

Four days after U.S. forces captured Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro on January 3, 2026, on charges of drug trafficking and human rights violations, a new Áltica poll across nine Latin American countries highlights divides between governments and publics. While leaders like Colombia's Gustavo Petro condemned the operation as a 'kidnapping,' majorities in Colombia (75%) and Chile showed pragmatic support amid border and security concerns.

Former Union Minister P Chidambaram has criticized US President Donald Trump's invasion of Venezuela as a violation of the Monroe Doctrine in his column. He termed it the Bush-Trump doctrine and saw it as a sign of imperialism's return. He also questioned India's neutrality on the issue.

Reported by AI

US President Donald Trump escalated sanctions against Cuba on January 31 by threatening tariffs on countries selling oil to the island, mainly targeting Mexico's supply. International leaders and organizations condemned the move as imperialist aggression and called for an end to the blockade. In Cuba, tensions with US diplomats persist amid worsening economic hardships.

Early on January 3, 2026, U.S. forces executed a large-scale operation in Caracas, capturing Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, who face U.S. charges of narco-terrorism and drug trafficking. President Donald Trump announced the action via Truth Social, stating the U.S. will temporarily run Venezuela to ensure a stable transition. The move has sparked sharp divisions, with Democrats decrying it as unconstitutional and Republicans praising it as decisive.

Reported by AI

Two analysts debate whether Brazil will face negative impacts from the US intervention in Venezuela, which led to Nicolás Maduro's capture. One argument highlights potential diplomatic and economic benefits, while the other warns of geopolitical and migration risks.

In the wake of the U.S. attack on Venezuela and detention of President Nicolás Maduro, Donald Trump dismissed opposition leader María Corina Machado's suitability for leading a democratic transition. The move has fueled speculation of a deal with Maduro's Chavista allies, amid fears of rising oil prices. Opposition figure Edmundo González renewed calls for releasing political prisoners.

Reported by AI

Two days after U.S. forces captured Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife in a raid on Caracas—taking them to New York to face drug trafficking charges—the operation has ignited global backlash. The United Nations and U.S. critics accuse the Trump administration of breaching international law by bypassing congressional approval, UN notification, and self-defense justifications.

 

 

 

This website uses cookies

We use cookies for analytics to improve our site. Read our privacy policy for more information.
Decline