U.S. interventions in Latin America trace back to Monroe Doctrine

President Trump's pressure campaign against Venezuela's Nicolás Maduro continues a long tradition of U.S. involvement in the region, rooted in the 1823 Monroe Doctrine. This history includes both covert and overt actions aimed at protecting American interests and countering perceived threats like communism. While some interventions achieved short-term goals, many led to unintended consequences and mixed outcomes.

The Monroe Doctrine, announced by President James Monroe in 1823, initially warned European powers against interfering in the Western Hemisphere. President Theodore Roosevelt later expanded it into the "Big Stick" policy, justifying unilateral U.S. actions as a regional policeman to advance interests, including military force alongside diplomacy.

After World War II, U.S. focus shifted to combating communism, intensified by Fidel Castro's 1959 Cuban Revolution. "During the Cold War, intervention was mostly covert. In the 1980s, you begin to see more overt actions," notes Eduardo Gamarra, a professor at Florida International University. This era emphasized strategic denial, deterring foreign influences—from Europeans in the 19th century to the Soviet Union postwar.

Edward Murphy, a history professor at Michigan State University, explains that the U.S. and right-wing Latin American governments viewed communism as a non-indigenous ideology to be eradicated under the Monroe Doctrine's logic.

Key examples illustrate the varied results:
- In 1954, the CIA orchestrated a coup in Guatemala against President Jacobo Árbenz over land reforms affecting the United Fruit Company, installing authoritarian rule and inspiring repression elsewhere.
- The 1961 Bay of Pigs invasion failed to topple Castro, prompting the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis and a lasting U.S. embargo that strengthened Cuba's ties with Russia.
- Operation Urgent Fury in Grenada (1983) ousted a Marxist government, protecting U.S. students and leading to stable democracy.
- Reagan's support for Nicaraguan Contras against Daniel Ortega's Sandinistas sparked the Iran-Contra scandal; Ortega later won elections and shifted to authoritarian rule.
- The 1989 invasion of Panama removed Gen. Manuel Noriega amid drug ties, fostering economic growth and democracy, though debated as truly successful.

By the mid-1980s, U.S. policy pivoted to the drug war. Recent actions against Venezuela, including strikes on drug boats and oil tanker seizures, echo this interventionist legacy, often yielding complex legacies rather than clear victories.

Articoli correlati

Illustration of Maduro's U.S. capture dividing Latin American leaders and publics, with poll data highlighting public support in Colombia and Chile.
Immagine generata dall'IA

Sondaggi latinoamericani e cambiamenti geopolitici dopo la cattura di Maduro da parte degli USA

Riportato dall'IA Immagine generata dall'IA

Quattro giorni dopo che le forze USA hanno catturato il presidente venezuelano Nicolás Maduro il 3 gennaio 2026, con accuse di traffico di droga e violazioni dei diritti umani, un nuovo sondaggio Áltica in nove paesi latinoamericani evidenzia le divisioni tra governi e opinioni pubbliche. Mentre leader come Gustavo Petro della Colombia hanno condannato l'operazione come un 'sequestro', le maggioranze in Colombia (75%) e Cile hanno mostrato un sostegno pragmatico in mezzo a preoccupazioni per confini e sicurezza.

Former Union Minister P Chidambaram has criticized US President Donald Trump's invasion of Venezuela as a violation of the Monroe Doctrine in his column. He termed it the Bush-Trump doctrine and saw it as a sign of imperialism's return. He also questioned India's neutrality on the issue.

Riportato dall'IA

US President Donald Trump escalated sanctions against Cuba on January 31 by threatening tariffs on countries selling oil to the island, mainly targeting Mexico's supply. International leaders and organizations condemned the move as imperialist aggression and called for an end to the blockade. In Cuba, tensions with US diplomats persist amid worsening economic hardships.

Early on January 3, 2026, U.S. forces executed a large-scale operation in Caracas, capturing Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, who face U.S. charges of narco-terrorism and drug trafficking. President Donald Trump announced the action via Truth Social, stating the U.S. will temporarily run Venezuela to ensure a stable transition. The move has sparked sharp divisions, with Democrats decrying it as unconstitutional and Republicans praising it as decisive.

Riportato dall'IA

Due analisti dibattono se il Brasile subirà impatti negativi dall'intervento USA in Venezuela, che ha portato alla cattura di Nicolás Maduro. Un argomento evidenzia potenziali benefici diplomatici ed economici, mentre l'altro avverte sui rischi geopolitici e migratori.

In seguito all'attacco degli Stati Uniti sul Venezuela e alla detenzione del presidente Nicolás Maduro, Donald Trump ha respinto l'idoneità della leader dell'opposizione María Corina Machado a guidare una transizione democratica. La mossa ha alimentato speculazioni su un accordo con gli alleati chavisti di Maduro, tra timori di un rialzo dei prezzi del petrolio. La figura dell'opposizione Edmundo González ha rinnovato gli appelli al rilascio dei prigionieri politici.

Riportato dall'IA

Two days after U.S. forces captured Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife in a raid on Caracas—taking them to New York to face drug trafficking charges—the operation has ignited global backlash. The United Nations and U.S. critics accuse the Trump administration of breaching international law by bypassing congressional approval, UN notification, and self-defense justifications.

 

 

 

Questo sito web utilizza i cookie

Utilizziamo i cookie per l'analisi per migliorare il nostro sito. Leggi la nostra politica sulla privacy per ulteriori informazioni.
Rifiuta