The Superintendence of Industry and Commerce rejected Dimayor's request for a computer expert to review digital evidence in an investigation into alleged collusion in the player transfer market.
The case originated in 2021 with an investigation against 17 clubs, Dimayor and 20 leaders for allegedly controlling the transfer market, violating free competition rules.
The SIC denied the expert review arguing that the evidence was already verified and that the investigated parties had not used prior legal channels to challenge it. The entity responded to a March 2026 order from the Constitutional Court.
The Court had ruled in favor of Dimayor after a tutela claiming a due process violation, as the SIC had not ruled on the request before closing the evidence stage in December 2024.
Superintendent Cielo Rusinque confirmed that the SIC filed a nullity action against the Court ruling to protect players' rights against anticompetitive practices.
