Britiske NGO-leder sagsøger USA over indrejsforbud for anti-hat-aktivister

Imran Ahmed, leder for det britiske Center for Countering Digital Hate med permanent opholdstilladelse i USA, har sagsøgt den amerikanske regering over indrejsforbud pålagt ham og fire andre europæere, der bekæmper online-hat, inklusive HateAid-ledere. En føderal dommer har udstedt en midlertidig forføjelse, der blokerer hans anholdelse eller deportering.

Efter USA's udenrigsministeriums kunngørelse den 24. december om indrejsforbud rettet mod europæiske aktivister anklaget for bånd til et 'globalt censurkompleks', har Imran Ahmed – der leder Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) i London og Washington D.C. – indgivet et søgsmål, der udfordrer hans deportering. Ahmed udtalte: "Jeg kæmper mod min ulovlige deportering fra mit hjemland."

Søgsmålet navngiver udenrigsminister Marco Rubio, viceminister Sarah Rogers, justitsminister Pam Bondi og minister for fæderal sikkerhed Kristi Noem. Regeringen har stempled Ahmed og andre – den britiske aktivist Clare Melford (Global Disinformation Index), HateAid-direktørerne Anna-Lena von Hodenberg og Josephine Ballon samt tidligere EU-kommissær Thierry Breton – som 'radikale aktivister' uden beviser. Rogers har tidligere kaldt Ahmed en 'nøglemedhjælper' i bestræbelser mod amerikanske borgere.

Tyske embedsmænd har kritiseret forbudene: udenrigsminister Johann Wadephul (CDU) kaldte dem 'uacceptabelе', mens justitsminister Stefanie Hubig (SPD) lovede støtte og afviste censuranklager. Tiltagene hænger sammen med EU's gennemførelse af Digital Services Act (DSA) mod platforme som X, der nylig fik en bøde på 120 millioner euro.

En føderal dommer har givet en midlertidig forføjelse mod Ahmeds anholdelse eller deportering, med en høring sat til mandag. Udenrigsministeriet har ikke kommenteret.

Relaterede artikler

Dramatic courtroom illustration of an immigration judge issuing a final removal order against Syrian-born Columbia protest organizer Mahmoud Khalil.
Billede genereret af AI

Immigration appeals board denies Mahmoud Khalil’s appeal, issuing final removal order

Rapporteret af AI Billede genereret af AI Faktatjekket

The Board of Immigration Appeals has issued a final order of removal against Mahmoud Khalil, a Syrian-born U.S. lawful permanent resident and prominent Columbia University protest organizer, according to his lawyers. Khalil and his attorneys say the case is politically motivated and plan to continue challenging it in federal court, where a separate proceeding has so far prevented his immediate deportation.

New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani welcomed anti-Israel activist Mahmoud Khalil and his family to Gracie Mansion on March 10, 2026, to break the Ramadan fast, marking the one-year anniversary of Khalil's detention by federal agents. The event drew criticism as a challenge to the Trump administration's deportation efforts against Khalil, whom the Department of Homeland Security has accused of sympathizing with Hamas. Mamdani described Khalil's experience as one of hardship and courage, while accusing Israel of genocide in Palestine.

Rapporteret af AI

A class-action lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court in Maine accuses Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and the Trump administration of violating First Amendment rights through the use of facial recognition software and other surveillance tools. The complaint alleges that federal agents targeted citizens recording their activities in public spaces during immigration enforcement operations. Plaintiffs seek an injunction to halt these practices and expunge related records.

US President Donald Trump stated that Democratic congresswomen Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib should be interned and sent back to their countries of origin. The remark followed their interruptions during his State of the Union address. Both are American citizens of Muslim origin.

Rapporteret af AI

Five months after the Trump administration paused immigration processing from high-risk countries following a deadly D.C. shooting, the policy—now covering 39 nations—has stranded thousands already in the U.S. in legal limbo, facing job losses, stalled careers, and deportation fears. Personal stories highlight hardship, while lawsuits yield court orders for relief.

Dette websted bruger cookies

Vi bruger cookies til analyse for at forbedre vores side. Læs vores privatlivspolitik for mere information.
Afvis