The Great Consultation emerges as the most significant political phenomenon in 65 years of Colombian history, with diverse candidates showing maturity by setting aside personal egos for the nation's benefit. It arises amid extreme polarization, preventing a contest dominated by radicals. It offers a chance to select competent administrators rather than improvisers.
In recent years, Colombia has grappled with a narrative pushed by President Gustavo Petro, claiming the country is progressing well but hindered in its governance. This view has swayed uninformed sectors and radical leftists, deepening divisions. Without a strong center or center-right candidate, the electoral landscape pointed to a first round dominated by extremes: armed group attacks fueled hardline options, while inflammatory statements from the far right bolstered the left.
A runoff between opposing poles would pose severe risks, including heightened polarization, campaign violence, and potential frauds in a weakened institutional setting. In contrast, the Great Consultation enables a unified center and center-right candidate, supported by seasoned public administration experts like Mauricio Cárdenas and possibly Juan Carlos Pinzón.
The author stresses that Colombia needs state-savvy leaders able to act from day one, rejecting demagogic policies from both left and right. He critiques the appeal of a far-right candidate whose eloquence masks an inconsistent background, noting that voters should choose an administrator, not an entertainer. Historically, pragmatic alliances have proven vital, such as those of Roosevelt and Churchill with Stalin or Lleras Camargo with Gómez, without moral purism.
This consultation fosters hope by advocating moderation, discipline, and respect, steering away from a path of hate and exclusion. It is regarded as the best Christmas gift for Colombians.
