Supreme court rejects damages suit by children of Hiroshima hibakusha

Japan's Supreme Court has rejected a damages lawsuit filed by 27 children of Hiroshima atomic bomb survivors, upholding lower court rulings in favor of the state. The plaintiffs argued that excluding hibakusha children from the hibakusha support law was unconstitutional.

On January 26, 2026, Japan's Supreme Court's First Petty Bench issued a decision confirming lower court rulings in favor of the state in a damages lawsuit brought by 27 children of hibakusha from Hiroshima.

The plaintiffs contended that excluding children of atomic bomb survivors from the hibakusha support law violated the constitution. In February 2023, the Hiroshima District Court dismissed the suit, stating that parliament held discretion over the law's scope. The Hiroshima High Court upheld this in December 2024.

A similar lawsuit by children of Nagasaki hibakusha was rejected by the Supreme Court in January 2025. These rulings underscore the judiciary's deference to legislative decisions on support for victims of the World War II atomic bombings.

The hibakusha support law primarily aids survivors with medical and financial assistance due to long-term effects of the 1945 bombings. The plaintiffs sought inclusion citing potential genetic impacts, but the courts did not accept this argument.

Related Articles

Hong Kong officials presenting HK$2.3 billion support fund cheque to Wang Fuk Court fire victims' families amid building ruins.
Image generated by AI

Hong Kong fire support fund reaches 2.3 billion HK dollars

Reported by AI Image generated by AI

The Hong Kong government announced that the support fund for the Wang Fuk Court fire has reached HK$2.3 billion, including HK$2 billion in public donations and HK$300 million in seed funding. The fund will help affected residents rebuild homes and provide long-term support. The blaze in Tai Po's Wang Fuk Court has killed 156 people and injured 79.

South Korea's Supreme Court has finalized a ruling ordering a Japanese construction firm to compensate the family of a wartime forced labor victim. The 22-year-old victim, surnamed Park, was conscripted in October 1944 at the firm's Fukushima office and died the following February. The decision upholds a 2018 top court ruling affirming victims' rights to seek damages.

Reported by AI

The Osaka District Court dismissed a request from three death-row inmates to ban executions by hanging, ruling that such a challenge is inappropriate through administrative litigation. The inmates argued that hanging violates an international treaty prohibiting cruel punishments. Presiding Judge Noriko Yokota stated that criminal judgments in Japan presuppose hanging as the method of execution.

The year 2025 witnessed a major constitutional crisis in Kenya's legal sector, with Chief Justice Martha Koome and other High Court judges facing disciplinary complaints from lawyers Nelson Havi, Ahmednasir Abdullahi, and Raphael Tuju. These complaints have triggered investigations and potential removal proceedings. The dispute highlights tensions between judicial independence and accountability.

Reported by AI

In a 2025 Supreme Court shadow-docket ruling, Justice Neil Gorsuch's concurring opinion harshly criticized a veteran district judge, prompting backlash for its tone and implications for judicial hierarchy. The decision paused a lower court's block on the Trump administration's cancellation of NIH research grants. Legal analysts highlighted the opinion as emblematic of broader issues with the court's emergency procedures.

Tetsuya Yamagami, accused of assassinating former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe in 2022, apologized for the first time to Abe's family during a hearing at Nara District Court. He acknowledged causing them 3½ years of pain despite harboring no grudge, stating he had no excuse given his own loss of family members. Abe's widow, Akie, attended the previous day's hearing but was absent on Thursday.

Reported by AI

A federal judge in Campana declared invalid the presidential decree suspending the Disability Emergency Law and ordered its immediate application nationwide. The ruling rejects the Government's fiscal arguments and emphasizes protection of vulnerable rights. The Executive announced it will appeal the decision.

 

 

 

This website uses cookies

We use cookies for analytics to improve our site. Read our privacy policy for more information.
Decline