Three in four Filipino students use AI writing tools, poll shows

An ASEAN Foundation report reveals that 83 percent of students in the Philippines have used generative AI, such as ChatGPT, for learning purposes. Three in four rely on it to paraphrase online sources and present them as their own in school writing tasks. AI adoption is driven by the younger population, according to ASEAN Foundation executive director Piti Srisangsam.

A recent ASEAN Foundation report highlights high levels of artificial intelligence use in Philippine education. Specifically, 83 percent of students have experimented with generative AI for academic tasks, exceeding the regional average.

Three in four students use these tools to rephrase texts from the internet and pass them off as original work. "AI adoption in the country is led by the younger population," said Srisangsam. Among educators, only 73 percent have used generative AI, with 42 percent relying on it for writing.

Across Southeast Asia, 87 percent of students use AI for information searches, while 75 percent seek writing assistance. With rising cybersecurity threats amid widening AI adoption, Srisangsam urged ASEAN members to bolster security policies and governance frameworks to mitigate risks.

"For Srisangsam, the Philippines is one of Southeast Asia’s leading economies in powering the AI charge," the report states. However, many Filipino educators criticize the ethics and reliability of AI in classrooms. "Srisangnam said now is the time for Southeast Asia to catch up on the AI race, warning that failing to level with its Asian neighbors could mean opportunity losses in the long run."

The report emphasizes the need for better regulations to harness the technology without undermining educational integrity.

Liittyvät artikkelit

Illustration of Swedes in a Stockholm cafe using AI chatbots amid survey stats on rising usage and skepticism.
AI:n luoma kuva

Tekoälybottien käyttö lisääntynyt ruotsalaisten keskuudessa – huolet kasvaneet samalla

Raportoinut AI AI:n luoma kuva

Göteborgin yliopiston uusimman SOM-tutkimuksen mukaan viikoittain tekoälybotteja käyttävien ruotsalaisten osuus nousi 12 prosentista 36 prosenttiin vuosien 2024 ja 2025 välillä. Samaan aikaan skeptisyys tekoälyä kohtaan on kasvanut: 62 prosenttia vastaajista pitää sitä yhteiskunnalle suurempana riskinä kuin mahdollisuutena.

A poll by the Korea Chamber of Commerce and Industry (KCCI) shows South Korean workers have cut their hours by an average of 8.4 per week, or 17.8 percent overall, thanks to generative AI platforms. More than half of respondents use such tools daily, with the highest adoption in the information and telecommunications sector.

Raportoinut AI

Japan exhibits strong public confidence in AI as a solution to labor shortages, yet workplace adoption remains shallow. While government and corporations push for integration, creators voice concerns over copyrights and income. Experts highlight skill gaps as key barriers.

Ruotsin korkeakouluvirasto Universitetskanslersämbetet (UKÄ) raportoi, että huijaamisesta annettujen varoitusten ja opinto-oikeuden keskeytysten määrä kasvoi kolme prosenttia vuosien 2024 ja 2025 välillä koskettaen 2 328:aa opiskelijaa. Tekoälytyökalujen luvaton käyttö nousi ensimmäistä kertaa yleisimmäksi huijaamisen muodoksi 851 tapauksella vuonna 2025.

Raportoinut AI

Stefan Düll, president of the German Teachers' Association, warns of the impact of students' use of artificial intelligence on homework. He calls for greater scrutiny of how work is produced and more handwriting in exams. At the same time, he urges against blanket condemnation of young people's handling of technology.

A recent report indicates that 58 percent of people in Britain encountered significant online risks during 2025. The rise in AI usage has contributed to a decline in digital trust, according to the findings. Fraud and cyberbullying emerged as the primary concerns.

Raportoinut AI

Researchers from the University of Pennsylvania have identified 'cognitive surrender,' where people outsource reasoning to AI without verification. In experiments, participants accepted incorrect AI responses 73.2 percent of the time across 1,372 participants. Factors like time pressure increased reliance on flawed outputs.

 

 

 

Tämä verkkosivusto käyttää evästeitä

Käytämme evästeitä analyysiä varten parantaaksemme sivustoamme. Lue tietosuojakäytäntömme tietosuojakäytäntö lisätietoja varten.
Hylkää