Dramatic illustration of US border officials denying entry to HateAid leaders amid censorship dispute.
Dramatic illustration of US border officials denying entry to HateAid leaders amid censorship dispute.
Larawang ginawa ng AI

US imposes entry bans on HateAid leadership

Larawang ginawa ng AI

The United States has imposed entry bans on the leaders of the German organization HateAid, which combats online hate. The reason is alleged censorship of American online platforms. Also affected are a former EU commissioner and British NGO representatives.

The US government imposed entry bans on Tuesday against Anna-Lena von Hodenberg and Josephine Ballon, the managing directors of the Berlin-based organization HateAid. The US State Department justifies this by accusing the activists of censoring American platforms. Founded in 2018, HateAid is Germany's first nationwide counseling center against digital violence. Von Hodenberg was awarded the Federal Cross of Merit in October for her efforts.

State Secretary Sarah B. Rogers stated on X: “Our message is clear: If you dedicate your career to censoring American expressions of opinion, you are unwelcome on American soil.” Similar sanctions target former EU Internal Market Commissioner Thierry Breton, who until September 2024 was responsible for EU digital laws like the Digital Services Act, as well as British NGO representatives Imran Ahmed from the Center for Countering Digital Hate and Clare Melford from the Global Disinformation Index.

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio criticized on X: “For too long, ideologues in Europe have led organized efforts to force American platforms to punish American viewpoints that don't suit them.” The measures follow an EU fine of 120 million euros against Elon Musk's platform X for transparency shortcomings. Rubio called it an “attack on all American tech platforms and the American people by foreign governments” and threatened to expand the list.

The sanctions highlight tensions between the US and EU over internet regulation. HateAid collaborates with the EU to combat online hate crimes.

Ano ang sinasabi ng mga tao

Discussions on X predominantly celebrate the US entry bans on HateAid leaders as a strong stand against perceived European censorship of American platforms. Conservative and free speech advocates in the US and Germany praise the Trump administration's actions. German right-wing users mock HateAid as a 'censorship tool'. Left-leaning voices criticize the bans as an attack on anti-hate efforts and EU sovereignty. Official State Department posts explain the sanctions target 'extraterritorial censorship'.

Mga Kaugnay na Artikulo

Courtroom scene depicting X appealing a €120 million EU Digital Services Act fine, with lawyers, judges, and symbolic elements.
Larawang ginawa ng AI

X appeals EU €120 million ($140 million) Digital Services Act fine

Iniulat ng AI Larawang ginawa ng AI Fact checked

X said it has appealed a €120 million ($140 million) fine imposed by the European Commission for breaches of transparency obligations under the EU’s Digital Services Act, in what could become a first major court test of the bloc’s new online-platform rulebook.

The European Parliament is voicing growing concerns over US interferences, including sanctions against figures like Thierry Breton and Judge Nicolas Guillou. A special commission led by Nathalie Loiseau plans a session on the issue. At the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen appears to be looking the other way.

Iniulat ng AI

Former aid minister Isabella Lövin has branded it a 'complete scandal' that Sweden Democrats-linked Hepatica is channeling aid money to Brazil's IAC, which opposes abortion. Sida is requesting more details from Hepatica following DN's revelation, and aid minister Benjamin Dousa has not ruled out reclaiming the funds.

Gumagamit ng cookies ang website na ito

Gumagamit kami ng cookies para sa analytics upang mapabuti ang aming site. Basahin ang aming patakaran sa privacy para sa higit pang impormasyon.
Tanggihan