Nelson Mandela fund warns of social media ban risks for children

The Nelson Mandela Children’s Fund has raised concerns about the potential downsides of prohibiting social media access for children, following Australia's recent ban on use by those under 16. Experts emphasize the need for parental guidance and adherence to health guidelines rather than outright restrictions. South Africa is urged to carefully assess any similar measures.

The Nelson Mandela Children’s Fund has highlighted potential risks associated with banning social media for children, in light of Australia becoming the first nation to implement such a prohibition for those under 16. This development, announced earlier this week, has prompted discussions on balancing child protection with access to digital tools.

Samke Mnguni, Youth Leadership Programmes Manager at the fund, acknowledged Australia's bold step as prioritizing child welfare over commercial interests but stopped short of full endorsement. She stressed the importance of thorough evaluation before any adoption in South Africa. "Though I cannot say that we fully support Australia’s decision to ban social media platform use by children under the age of 16, we think Australia was bold to take this decision because it demonstrated that child welfare is more important than profits," Mnguni stated. She further noted the limitations of bans, pointing out that children may still access platforms covertly, necessitating stronger parental involvement. "When parents refuse their children to use social media platforms, it does not mean that the child will not use them. This means as parents, there needs to be firmness and constructive conversations with their children on the implications of the use of social media platforms."

Complementing this view, Early Childhood Development Specialist Kwanda Ndoda advocated for following World Health Organisation guidelines on screen time to safeguard children's health. These recommendations exclude television but cover devices like phones and tablets. Ndoda explained, "Screentime is the time spent watching a screen. The World Health Organisation has strict guidelines that everyone needs to follow for the benefit of their own health, which includes guidelines on how parents can handle screentime for children... One of the guidelines is if a parent allows a child screentime, it is important for the parent to be close by and monitor the child while the child is on screen."

This caution underscores a broader call for informed strategies that promote safe digital engagement over blanket prohibitions.

Articoli correlati

Illustration depicting a lively debate in Bad Segeberg on proposed social media ban for under-16s, featuring protesting youth, discussing parents, and supportive politician.
Immagine generata dall'IA

Debate on social media ban under 16 in Bad Segeberg

Riportato dall'IA Immagine generata dall'IA

In Bad Segeberg, the proposed ban on social media for children and youth under 16 is under intense discussion. Young people and parents express differing opinions, while Schleswig-Holstein's Minister President Daniel Günther supports it. The question of feasibility remains central.

Diversi paesi hanno implementato o discusso misure per limitare l'accesso dei bambini e degli adolescenti ai social media, citando impatti sulla salute mentale e sulla privacy. In Argentina, gli esperti sottolineano la necessità di educazione digitale e regolamentazioni strutturali oltre a semplici divieti. La questione coinvolge non solo la protezione dei minori ma anche il modello di business delle piattaforme basato sui dati.

Riportato dall'IA

As Australia's groundbreaking ban on social media for minors under 16 takes effect—sparking Reddit's High Court challenge—experts debate its mental health benefits versus risks of driving use underground. The law targets platforms like TikTok and Instagram to curb harmful content exposure.

L'Assemblea Nazionale ha approvato lunedì 26 gennaio un disegno di legge che vieta i social media ai minori sotto i 15 anni, nonché l'uso dei cellulari nelle scuole superiori. Sostenuta dal governo e da Emmanuel Macron, la misura mira a proteggere la salute psicologica degli adolescenti. La deputata Laure Miller, promotrice del disegno, l'ha definita un 'passo importante'.

Riportato dall'IA

Following the French National Assembly's January approval of a bill banning social media for minors under 15, implementation could begin this autumn. The move aligns with growing EU efforts, including pushes from Luxembourg and the EU Parliament, as countries like the UK, Spain, Denmark, and Sweden pursue similar protections for youth.

South Africa's Cabinet has approved a new National Strategy to Accelerate Action for Children, focusing on basic needs like nutrition, safety, and education to improve child welfare. Despite progress over the past three decades, many children still face significant risks, and the strategy aims to reverse negative trends in health and wellbeing. It identifies 10 priorities to support parents, protect children from harm, and enhance early learning opportunities.

Riportato dall'IA

In a detailed High Court filing, Reddit argues Australia's under-16 social media ban infringes constitutional rights to free political discourse and misclassifies the platform, following its initial compliance and subsequent challenge announcement. The government likens the suit to Big Tobacco resistance, as Reddit leverages its resources in its fourth-largest market.

 

 

 

Questo sito web utilizza i cookie

Utilizziamo i cookie per l'analisi per migliorare il nostro sito. Leggi la nostra politica sulla privacy per ulteriori informazioni.
Rifiuta