Reddit challenges Australia's under-16 social media ban in high court

Reddit has filed a legal challenge against Australia's new law banning social media access for those under 16, arguing it imposes intrusive verification and limits free expression. The San Francisco-based company announced the High Court action on Thursday, shortly after implementing age verification measures to comply with the legislation that took effect on Tuesday. The ban targets platforms like TikTok, Facebook, Instagram, and Reddit, with fines up to $33 million for non-compliance.

Australia became the first country to enact a nationwide ban on social media for children under 16 when the law went into effect on Tuesday. The legislation requires platforms to prevent access using age-assurance technologies such as facial analysis, voice checks, or account activity assessments. Social media companies face fines of up to $33 million AUD if they fail to enforce the restrictions.

Reddit, which initially appeared compliant, reversed course by announcing a High Court challenge on Thursday. In a statement posted to X, the company said the law "has the unfortunate effect of forcing intrusive and potentially insecure verification processes on adults as well as minors, isolating teens from the ability to engage in age-appropriate community experiences." Earlier, Reddit described the legislation as "arbitrary, legally erroneous, and goes far beyond the original intent of the Australian Parliament," while noting exemptions for other platforms.

Prior to the challenge, Reddit implemented age verification in Australia on Tuesday, using an age prediction model for new and existing users. Those predicted under 16 must provide government ID or a selfie for verification, with accounts suspended if underage. The company promised secure storage of age data, not sharing it with advertisers or brokers. Globally, users under 18 now face modified app experiences: no access to NSFW content, stricter chat settings, disabled ad personalization, and no sensitive ads like those for alcohol or gambling.

The ban, inspired by Jonathan Haidt's book The Anxious Generation, exempts gaming platforms like Discord and educational tools like YouTube Kids, as well as AI chatbots such as ChatGPT. Other companies are complying: TikTok noted the restrictions may upset users, Meta is removing under-16 accounts, and Snapchat plans to boot nearly half a million Australian children. X owner Elon Musk criticized the law in 2024 as a "backdoor way to control access to the Internet."

Two 15-year-olds, backed by the Digital Freedom Project, are also challenging the ban in the High Court, arguing it sacrifices freedom of expression for teens. Donna Rice Hughes, CEO of Enough is Enough, praised Australia's approach, saying Big Tech's failure to prioritize child safety necessitated government intervention. She told CNET, "The carrot approach of voluntary industry efforts... hasn't worked."

Several countries, including Denmark and France, are monitoring the ban's effectiveness.

Articoli correlati

French deputies applaud in the National Assembly after approving a ban on social media for under-15s and phones in schools.
Immagine generata dall'IA

Deputati approvano divieto di social media per under 15

Riportato dall'IA Immagine generata dall'IA

L'Assemblea Nazionale ha approvato lunedì 26 gennaio un disegno di legge che vieta i social media ai minori sotto i 15 anni, nonché l'uso dei cellulari nelle scuole superiori. Sostenuta dal governo e da Emmanuel Macron, la misura mira a proteggere la salute psicologica degli adolescenti. La deputata Laure Miller, promotrice del disegno, l'ha definita un 'passo importante'.

In a detailed High Court filing, Reddit argues Australia's under-16 social media ban infringes constitutional rights to free political discourse and misclassifies the platform, following its initial compliance and subsequent challenge announcement. The government likens the suit to Big Tobacco resistance, as Reddit leverages its resources in its fourth-largest market.

Riportato dall'IA

As Australia's groundbreaking ban on social media for minors under 16 takes effect—sparking Reddit's High Court challenge—experts debate its mental health benefits versus risks of driving use underground. The law targets platforms like TikTok and Instagram to curb harmful content exposure.

Critics in the UK are voicing strong opposition to proposals that could restrict access to virtual private networks through age verification requirements. The plans, aimed at enhancing online safety, have sparked concerns about privacy and internet freedom. It remains uncertain whether these measures will actually become law.

Riportato dall'IA

Pornhub's parent company Aylo announced it will restrict access for new users in the UK from February 2, citing concerns over the nation's Online Safety Act age-verification requirements. Existing users who have already verified their ages will retain access. The move protests what Aylo calls a flawed system that pushes users toward unregulated sites.

In response to the ongoing Grok AI controversy—initially sparked by a December 28, 2025 incident generating sexualized images of minors—X has restricted the chatbot's image editing features to prevent nonconsensual alterations of real people into revealing attire like bikinis. The changes follow new investigations by California authorities, global blocks, and criticism over thousands of harmful images produced.

Riportato dall'IA Verificato

The European Commission’s first report on the Digital Services Act, published Monday, describes the law as “content‑agnostic” and aligned with fundamental rights, while civil society groups and U.S. officials warn it could chill speech and burden American tech firms.

 

 

 

Questo sito web utilizza i cookie

Utilizziamo i cookie per l'analisi per migliorare il nostro sito. Leggi la nostra politica sulla privacy per ulteriori informazioni.
Rifiuta