Study shows Alaska cash payments do not increase injuries or deaths

An 11-year analysis of Alaska's Permanent Fund Dividend program reveals no evidence that annual cash transfers lead to more traumatic injuries or unnatural deaths. Researchers from New York University and other institutions examined statewide hospital and death records from 2009 to 2019. The findings challenge concerns about reckless spending among recipients.

Programs providing direct cash to individuals are expanding in the United States, but critics often argue that unrestricted funds might encourage harmful behaviors, such as excessive alcohol or drug use, potentially raising risks of injury or death. A new study counters these worries by focusing on Alaska's longstanding Permanent Fund Dividend (PFD), which has distributed annual payments to all residents since 1982. The payments typically range from $1,000 to $2,000 per person and are issued in the fall.

The research, led by Ruby Steedle from New York University's Cash Transfer Lab, analyzed data covering the entire state population over 11 years. It reviewed all traumatic injuries recorded in Alaska's trauma registry and all unnatural deaths from vital records between 2009 and 2019. No increases in serious injuries or mortality were found in the short term—specifically, the week to month following payment distribution. This pattern held even in urban areas of Alaska, which are similar to small and medium-sized cities elsewhere in the US.

"Past research has shown that cash transfers are an effective tool for reducing poverty, but their implementation is often limited by critics who worry about irresponsible spending that can lead to tragedy," said Sarah Cowan, founder and executive director of NYU's Cash Transfer Lab. "Those fears are unfounded. Our long-term study of a state's population shows no connection between cash transfers and serious injury or death."

Anne Zink, Alaska's chief medical officer from 2019 to 2024 and now a senior fellow at Yale School of Public Health, added: "This study provides the kind of population-level evidence that public health officials and policymakers need when evaluating guaranteed income programs. When looking across the entire state's population over 11 years, there was no evidence of increased trauma or mortality temporally associated with the PFD cash transfer."

The study, published in the American Journal of Epidemiology, involved collaborators from the University of California San Francisco School of Medicine and other NYU researchers. It stands out for its comprehensive scope, covering a full state over a longer period than prior research, which has shown mixed results on cash transfers and harm. The authors conclude that fears of short-term harm from such payments lack supporting evidence.

Articoli correlati

Illustration of Pennsylvania government records showing nearly $3 million spent on youth gender-related medical care in early 2025, featuring spilling cash, hormone treatment icons, and the state capitol with rising expenditure graph.
Immagine generata dall'IA

Pennsylvania spent nearly $3 million on youth gender‑related care in first nine months of 2025, records show

Riportato dall'IA Immagine generata dall'IA Verificato

Government records obtained by a conservative advocacy group indicate that Pennsylvania paid nearly $3 million for gender‑related medical services for minors and young adults between January and mid‑September 2025, even as the Trump administration has moved to restrict federal support for such care. The spending continues a sharp rise since 2015, with tens of millions of dollars in public funds going to thousands of patients, and has prompted Republican lawmakers to press for new limits.

Following its push to redirect MAIFIP funds to LGUs, the Department of Health rejected proposals to shift them to PhilHealth over payment delays, with Secretary Ted Herbosa dismissing pork barrel claims as funds go directly to hospitals—amid the program's P51 billion 2026 budget hike.

Riportato dall'IA

As the bicameral committee advances the Assistance to Individuals in Crisis Situations (AICS) and Medical Assistance to Indigent and Financially Incapacitated Patients (MAIFIP), experts link these programs to fostering dependency and corruption rather than genuine aid.

Una recente colonna esamina evidenze secondo cui l’espansione di Bolsa Família ha impattato negativamente sull’offerta di lavoro in Brasile, sebbene questo effetto sembri attenuarsi dalla metà del 2025. Il numero di beneficiari è sceso da 22 milioni a fine 2022 a 18,7 milioni a dicembre 2025, grazie a miglioramenti del mercato del lavoro e controlli più rigorosi. Nonostante i svantaggi, gli studi mostrano che i benefici del programma superano i suoi effetti negativi.

Riportato dall'IA

Starting December 24, 2025, Colombia's government Jóvenes en Paz program will disburse over 17.6 billion pesos to 15,440 vulnerable youth nationwide as part of cycle 12 of the initiative.

The Pension Transitional Arrangement Directorate (PTAD) has disbursed N29.99 billion to retirees under the Direct Benefit Scheme (DBS) during the third quarter of 2025.

Riportato dall'IA

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has frozen $10 billion in funding for welfare programs in California, Colorado, Illinois, Minnesota, and New York amid concerns over fraud. Officials are investigating whether benefits are being improperly directed to non-citizens. The move affects key programs providing childcare and assistance to low-income families.

 

 

 

Questo sito web utilizza i cookie

Utilizziamo i cookie per l'analisi per migliorare il nostro sito. Leggi la nostra politica sulla privacy per ulteriori informazioni.
Rifiuta